Racial Tension, and Sexual Exploitation

scepteredisle.jpg
According to the NSPCC up to 5,000 children and young adults may be working as prostitutes in Britain, and the number appears to be rising. They are also being trapped into a life of prostitution at a younger age than previous.

In some cases, the NSPCC states, peer pressure is to blame. Clearly, children are being increasingly sexualized through the media, and this, of course, feeds very rapidly into the way in which children see themselves and how they see the world. Girls, particularly, are encouraged to think of themselves as virtual adults, or, perhaps more especially, as virtual adult stars. A month ago, for example, an online ‘game’ called Miss Bimbo  was launched which, although aimed at children, gives players a naked virtual Bimbo character to be dressed, embellished with breast implants, and its virtual weight controlled by virtual diet pills – hardly a good example of womanhood.

However, according to the BBC’s investigative reporting program Panorama many British girls (some as young as 12) are “groomed” for prostitution by criminal gangs with networks that extend across the country. Such girls are typically not the out-of-control youths lacking parental guidance, such as we might assume. They are merely teenagers, easily manipulated and easily controlled by ruthless, older men. “Grooming” consists of an emotionally and mentally paralyzing mix of flattery and gifts from boys only slightly older than their victims, introductions to older men, drink, drugs, sexual abuse, and rape. According to Jane, who talked on Panorama about being forced into prostitution at the age of 13:

"The grooming starts where you meet them [slightly older boys in a group] and they're nice to you and take you to McDonald's and buy you cigarettes."

"I was flattered that older boys were interested in me, which at 13 is nice.”

"And then you start to meet the cousins and the brothers, and then you realize that you've been passed on because suddenly you're hanging around with older people."

"They [the older men] start to touch you and say sexual things to you."

"And then the abuse starts. I was pinned down by two men while a third man raped me.

"And there were other men watching."

The Daily Mail ran a couple of stories that drew on this particular episode of Panorama (‘Sex for Sale’) even before it had aired, though it concentrated largely on the racial composition of Britain’s various gangs, in contrast to the television program itself. The newspaper states, for example,   “these crimes frequently have a racial element: in many of the identifiable cases, the pimps come from the Asian or Afro-Caribbean communities”. The racial composition of Britain’s gangland is, accordingly, “largely Asian in northern England, Afro-Caribbean in the West Midlands and elsewhere White, Turkish and Kurdish.”  However, while the documentary focused on a specific few Asian criminals and their White, female victims, it only very briefly touched on the subject, and a description of the documentary on Panorama’s homepage makes no mention at all of the race of the pimps or their victims, though, not surprisingly.

Race and sexual abuse is a sensitive issue in multicultural Britain. The fear that racist groups will exploit the situation to enflame tensions, or that accusations of racism will emerge in response to any official enquiry, seem to run through the sad tale of child exploitation in Britain. A Channel 4 documentary made in 2004, claiming that Asian men in Bradford were grooming White girls for prostitution, was cancelled for fear of public anger. The Coalition for the Removal of Pimping (CROP) has, likewise, a lengthy statement against racism on its website noting that it will not cooperate with racist organizations, as:

“Racist and political exploitation of the issue confuses the issue and undermines, or even prevents, active responses by relevant responsible agencies.”

Both Conservative M.P. Philip Davies and Director of the Ramadhan Foundation Mohammed Shafiq have suggested that the police have so far failed to tackle the problem of Asian gangs pimping White girls for fear of being accused of racism. Shafiq, who appears in the Panorama show, has said:

"These are criminals they should be treated as criminals. They are not Asian criminals, they are not Muslim criminals, they are not White criminals. They are criminals and they should be treated as criminals."

"If there is a drug dealer grooming a White teenager into prostitution then I don't want the police service or local authority not to be open about it."

Although the police appear to have a good idea about the ethnicities of Britain’s gangs, according to the NSPCC little is known about the ethnic composition of its child prostitutes. Last year the press highlighted the plight of young women trafficked from Eastern Europe, though thousands are also brought into Britain every year from Asia and Africa, usually under the pretext that they will have a better life in the U.K. Yet they are uquickly used by their traffickers to obtain government benefits, and in many cases are made to work as prostitutes. Interestingly, the NSPCC does acknowledge that racism plays a part in the experiences of sexually exploited ethnic minority children, though it does not state exactly how, or whether the racism they experience comes primarily from pimps or those who pay to abuse them, etc.:

“We know very little about the experiences of Black and minority ethnic children and young people involved in prostitution, but available accounts points to racism as being important in understanding their experiences.”

As we are now becoming increasingly aware, different cultures conceive of sex, women, marriage, and homosexuality, etc., very differently. Notably, even within the Western world the age of consent, for example, can differ quite substantially. On the continent of Europe it can be as low as 13 or 14; in the U.K. the age is universally 16; and in the U.S. it can be 16, 17, or 18.

The authorities seem ill equipped to cope with such a complex problem as the child prostitution, crossing racial boundaries but yet evoking the issue of race as it does so. The mantra of British political establishment has long been that cultural “differences are to be celebrated”. Yet while it champions “multiculturalism” it understands not even one single culture, and, perhaps for this reason, treats the worst of every culture as if it must somehow be representative of the whole, and, as such, beyond criticism. It also clearly fails to understand young people.
With teenage pregnancies vastly increased in number in the last decade, the authorities – in an apparent attempt to rectify the problem – have encouraged teenagers to engage in oral sex (instead of copulation), and are now examining the idea of compulsory sex lessons for 5 year olds.  As if Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World is playing out before our eyes, government minister Dawn Primarolo has even suggested that teenage girls should be sterilized.  That way they would be free to have sex with anyone they want, or don’t want.

The authorities are no less inept when it comes to children of specifically non-British backgrounds. If Mohammed Shafiq has suggested that the police go softly on Asian gangs pimping White girls for fear of being accused of racism, the same fear raises its ugly head at the mention of the forced marriages of teenage girls – often to much older men from abroad. But, other, cultural issues emerge as well.
Bradford police support worker Philip Balmforth, who has spoken out about the scale of forced marriage in Britain – winning even the praise of M.P.s – now finds his position helping vulnerable young girls under threat, as members of the Bradford Council claim he has damaged the city’s reputation.  This response is not, perhaps, entirely unsurprising, however. The notion of reputation is central to some Asian cultures that have a very large presence in Bradford. According to an NSPCC survey of 500 people of Indian, Pakistani, and Bangladeshi origin, two thirds believed that reporting suspected child abuse would “have a negative affect on the 'honor'” of the victim’s family.

Again, in his report, The Poverty of Multicuturalism, for the Think Tank, Civitas, Patrick West observes that judges have regarded the ethnic culture of the murderer as a mitigating factor in some so-called “honor killings”, thus giving Asian-British girls, for example, less protection under the law. Likewise, Saira Khan in The Daily Mail has also denounced the National Health Service’s policy of performing “virginity repairs” on Muslim girls who fear that their families may harm or even kill them if they discover they have had sex out of wedlock:

“It's effectively condoning an increasingly fundamentalist Islamic culture that is patriarchal, regressive and increasingly demeaning to women.”

The government seems to have finally woken up to the scale and seriousness of child prostitution in Britain. The police will have new targets, and schools will receive educational videos tackling the issue. Yet, if children are to be protected across the board the government must also abandon issues for principles, seeing that the human rights of minors are upheld and that criminals are treated as criminals.



Ironically, many people that

Ironically, many people that say that the relationships between different races are improving are all black. The whites, however, say that they are getting better, but there numbers are not as great as the Black African Americans. This could be because most of the racial attacks are done to white African Americans.
ejaculare

BJ at its best

Excellent article, excellent discussion!

Official propaganda also helps the pimps

Thanks to relentless official propaganda attacking whites, the girls are frightened of seeming "racist", giving the non-white pimps another way to manipulate them. The propaganda also makes the pimps feel justified in what they're doing:

As well as simple opportunism, pimping of white females by black and ethnic-minority men can be a type of revenge against whites. “My parents ran a grocery shop,” says Hussein, who admits to being part of the pimping gangs in the late 1990s. “They had hardly any money, even though they worked their backsides off. White people treated them like shit, like they were their servants.” Hussein says he took “great pleasure” in having young white girls at his beck and call, knowing their parents would be out of their minds with worry. Although Hussein was reported to the police, he was never arrested for any crime, and is now working in Leeds.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2538090.ece

The whole situation is proof of how Britain's traitorous government and media work to harm whites. Mass immigration has brought non-whites flooding in, then the non-whites have been given privileges and encouraged to hate and prey on the white majority.

Re: Point # 1

@KA:

You claim to disagree with my contention in point #1. However, the person with such inclinations does not need to mask it in the Catholic Church in the USA.

Then why would the Pope do this?

Vatican, Sep. 22, 2005 (CWNews.com) - Pope Benedict XVI (bio - news) has given his approval to a new Vatican policy document indicating that men with homosexual tendencies should not be ordained as Catholic priests.

The new document-- which was prepared by the Congregation for Catholic Education, in response to a request made by the late Pope John Paul II (bio - news) in 1994-- will be published soon. It will take the form of an "Instruction," signed by the prefect and secretary of the Congregation: Cardinal Zenon Grocholewski and Archbishop Michael Miller.

The text, which was approved by Pope Benedict at the end of August, says that homosexual men should not be admitted to seminaries even if they are celibate, because their condition suggests a serious personality disorder which detracts from their ability to serve as ministers.

Priests who have already been ordained, if they suffer from homosexual impulses, are strongly urged to renew their dedication to chastity, and a manner of life appropriate to the priesthood.

The Instruction does not represent a change in Church teaching or policy. Catholic leaders have consistently taught that homosexual men should not be ordained to the priesthood. Pope John XXIII approved a formal policy to that effect, which still remains in effect. However, during the 1970s and 1980s, that policy was widely ignored, particularly in North America. The resulting crisis in the priesthood-- in which one prominent American commentator observed that the priesthood was coming to be seen as a "gay" profession-- prompted Pope John Paul II to call for a new study on the question.

The Congregation for Catholic Education prepared the Instruction after soliciting advice from all of the world's bishops, from psychologists, and from moral theologians. A draft of the Instruction was then circulated among the Vatican dicasteries concerned with the issue, notably including the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.

The pending release of the Instruction, in the face of certain criticism from liberal forces in America and Western Europe, demonstrates the determination of the Vatican to improve the quality of priestly ministry, and to protect the Church from some of the scandals that have recently shaken the Catholic community-- and no doubt deterred many men from entering priestly training...(Emphasis added)

It's no secret that the "Pink Seminaries" which have plagued the Church in America have nurtured and condoned homosexual behavior among its seminarians. Michael Rose's book, Good Bye, Good Men, details the appalling corruption within the walls of those seminaries, where these men openly cruise gay bars and engage in shocking sexual acts with each other. In that atmosphere of permissiveness, what's to stop them from sexual misconduct among parishioners?

"A stumbling-block to orthodox men in the seminaries is a pervasive "'gay subculture', comprised of both students and faculty"; some of the seminaries have gleefully earned such nicknames as "Notre Flame (for the Notre Dame Seminary in New Orleans)" and "Theological Closet (for Theological College at the Catholic University of America in Washington, D.C.)." "St. Mary's Seminary in Baltimore has earned the nickname the 'Pink Palace.'" Heterosexual, orthodox men who do make it into the seminaries often find themselves under seige by the homosexuals and having to fend off sexual advances, even rape. When they complain to the seminary leadership they are often told to be tolerant, to understand the others' need to "get in touch with their true sexuality". Those resisting often have to meet and study secretly, providing each other support -- a sort of true believers' underground..."

http://oregonmag.com/GoodMen802.htm

Don't let the liberal media fool you. They would suppress the evidence that the sex scandal is indeed a result of openly homosexual men infiltrating the Church's seminaries and instead proclaim that it's because of a "repression" of sexuality.

"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine

@Rob

Hey, Rob, pedophile priests in the US were a very small number proportionately. There isn't a day here that some predatory public school teacher - both sexes - isn't arrested for sexually inappropriate behavior, get real. A very large number of sexual abusers of children are mom's boyfriend or the step-father.

And, Rob, Islam wins hands down in the sexual abuse of children. Mohammed was the model pedophile, codified in the Koran, with permission to copy his behavior given to his followers for centuries. Anything that slob did is permissible with many of his followers.

Your knee-jerk swipe at Catholic priests is misplaced.

Point #3

You didn't read my post closely enough. Nowhere did I say that the sex scandal is EXCLUSIVELY homosexual. I said that the MAJORITY of them are homosexual in nature. Indeed, according to case records, they are at least 90% homosexual in nature in the USA.

"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine

RE: atheling vs. Rob

I must strongly side with atheling on most of the points she has made thus far in response to Rob's contention that Catholic priests are "world-class child molesters".

The very phrase makes one shudder with disgust, as "world-class" suggests that child molestation is an art or skill that can be honed and evaluated.

Although individual Catholic priests have participated in pederasty/ephebophilia/pedophilia (colloquial form), as well as some Catholic institutions such as various Canadian residential schools, the Catholic Church's overall impact on such practices has been unequivocally to suppress them, and substantially at that.

Moreover, atheling is quite correct that as far as pedophilia in particular is concerned, one has more indeed to fear from the average married or common law heterosexual male than the average padre.

Additionally, such sensation and hysteria surrounding sexual abuse perpetrated by Catholic priests is heavily influenced by anti-Catholic sentiment from Protestants, Jews and anti-clerical atheists.

However, I disagree with 3 of her contentions:

1. Priestly pederasty/ephebophilia is due to the American Catholic Church admitting openly homosexual priests
2. The sexualization of children is due to a recent cultural regression to pagan values
3. Pederasty/ephebophilia is exclusively homosexual

Firstly, an individual with such inclinations tends to mask them and also pursue vocations whereby they can pursue them with as minimal risk of exposure as possible. Unfortunately, the priesthood is one such vocation.

Secondly, pagan folkways cannot be "essentialized" as supporting these practices e.g. Stoicism, which influenced early Christianity, was decidedly against such sexualization. Far from a pagan comeback, it is more appropriate to say that Christianity has lost considerable ground in terms of influencing the spirit and letter of our laws and customs. Lacking a raison d'être, Western institutions are more open to revision by divergent and often competing interests.

Thirdly, pederasty/ephebophilia co-existed alongside normal heterosexual relations in the Mediterranean civilizations of antiquity. It was not considered homosexual or exclusive of marriage and children. Indeed, Sparta encouraged homosexuality among its armies in order to strengthen unit cohesion, a fact strangely omitted from "300"...

@Rob

Get the facts first.  The media has pounced on every instance of when a Catholic priest was ACCUSED (not just convicted) of ephebophilia - and as I've said before - the overwhelming majority of those instances were cases of EPHEBOPHILIA, not pedophilia.  Look it up, I'm tired of repeating myself.
The percentage of this occurring among Catholic priests is no more than it occurs among rabbis, protestant clergy etc... yet the press is eager to hype any alleged instance of it among Catholic priests because:
1.  They want to destroy the tradition of unmarried priesthood (hence blaming it on "not getting enough sex")
2.  They hate the Catholic Church.
Strangely enough, there are far more MARRIED men who commit these crimes than unmarried.  Also, the majority of these crimes among Catholic priests are HOMOSEXUAL in nature.  Unfortunately, the Catholic Church in the US has, since the 60's and 70's opened its doors to homosexual candidates for the priesthood - a result of political correctness.  Altogether, the "world class child molesters" you spout is only .2% of the accused who have been found guilty.  Homosexual priests molesting teenage boys are not "child molesters".  They are gay men who are attracted to young, post pubescent men. 
There's a difference. 
 
 
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine

Paganism? Catholic priests are world-class child molestors

at least in the US...

Paganism

The sexualization of children is a result of the increasing paganism of Western Civilization, which is lapsing back to the mores of the pre-Christian Romans and Greeks.  Human trafficking, the sexual objectification of women, children as sexual toys, etc... are nothing new. 
 
 
"He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach to himself.” – Thomas Paine

Panorama program

The BNP has talked about the problem for years but it didn't get much attention until recently.

There's a low quality copy of the Panorama program here:
Panorama - Teenage Sex For Sale S56E11 (March 27, 2008)

And a copy on Google:
http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=6107251333118159002