Turning Red: Immigrants Tip the Balance in Belgian Local Elections

In last March’s local elections in the Netherlands the immigrant vote tipped the balance in favour of the Socialists. The same phenomenon marked yesterday’s local elections in Belgium’s major cities. In Antwerp the Socialists became the largest party. They jumped from 19.5% to 35.3% of the votes, winning 22 of the 55 seats in the municipal council – a gain of ten seats. Seven of the Socialist councillors, almost one third of the total, are Muslim immigrants: Fatma Akbas, Karim Bachar, Ouardia El Taghdouini, Youssef Slassi, Fauzaya Talhaoui, Güler Turan, and Sener Ugurlu. Six of the seven are new in politics.

The self-declared “islamophobic” and Flemish-secessionist Vlaams Belang [Flemish Interest], which until yesterday was Antwerp’s largest party, gained a few extra votes, winning 33.5% of the vote (33.0% last time). Its number of seats remains steady at 20. Antwerp politics is now defined by a polarization between Socialists and the VB. Apart from the VB all parties lost heavily to the Socialists (-7.3% for the Liberals and -6.4% for the Greens). The only party able to avoid being swallowed by the Socialists are the Christian-Democrats. They won 11.2% of the votes, adding an extra 0.1%, and kept their six seats. The Christian-Democrats, too, had put forward immigrant candidates. Two of their elected candidates, one third of the total, are Muslims: Nahima Lanjri and Ergün Top.

The VB also stagnated in other cities with large numbers of immigrants, such as Brussels, Ghent and Mechelen. After the 2000 local elections, in which the VB gained considerably, the Belgian regime extended the vote to immigrants for municipal elections and passed the so-called “Quick Citizenship Bill.” The latter grants hassle-free Belgian citizenship virtually upon demand to every individual who has lived in the country for three (in some cases only two) years, which enfranchises them in the general elections, too (voting is compulsory in Belgium). These measures were introduced with the specific intent of countering the VB.

As Leona Detiège, the then Socialist Antwerp mayor, told Knack Magazine on 13 September 2000: “The Vlaams Blok [as the Vlaams Belang was called at the time] is currently overrepresented because the immigrants are not allowed to vote.” And as Johan Leman, the then director of the Center for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism (CEOOR), a government agency working for the Belgian Prime Minister, announced in the newspaper De Standaard on 15 January 2000: “What will ‘our own people’ still mean fifteen years from now? We will get so many new Belgians that this slogan becomes meaningless. The Vlaams Blok is a thing of the past.” Meanwhile six of Leman’s fifteen years have passed...

Ironically, as I pointed out earlier, in their efforts to counter the indigenous “racists” and “fascists” of the VB, the Socialists and Christian-Democrats do not hesitate to put far-right Muslim candidates on their electoral lists. Some of them, such a Murat Denizli, a member of the Turkish racist and fascist organization Grey Wolves which assassinates Socialist councilors at home, have now become Socialist councilors in Belgium (Mr Denizli was elected for the Parti Socialiste in the Brussels borough of Schaarbeek).

On 10 September I wrote that European politics will swing dramatically to the Left in the coming decades, owing to the growing influence of an immigrant vote eager to retain and expand the welfare benefits. Another trend, however, is also visible.

While yesterday’s elections saw the VB stagnate in the cities the party won massively in the smaller towns and villages. This is likely to continue. While Europe’s cities and major towns turn Muslim and red, the countryside will remain indigenous and will become ever more “islamophobic” and hostile to the cities. The indigenous Europeans – at least if they can afford it – are moving out of the cities (indeed, they are fleeing them). As Filip Dewinter, the VB leader in Antwerp, said in an interview last month: “I am a realist. The number of potential voters for our party is declining year by year [in Antwerp, which has 460,000 inhabitants]. Currently a quarter of the population are immigrants. These people do not vote for us. Every year 4,000 indigenous Antwerpians move out and 5,000 immigrants move in.”

The former city dwellers have moved to suburbia, where towns such as Schoten saw their percentage of VB voters rise yesterday from 24.5 to 34.7%, and to rural districts such as Mol, which saw the VB grow from 13.1 to 21.9%.

Is Democracy Doomed?

Can democracy work when parties conduct such reckless actions to gain votes? In order to gain votes to stay in power for 15-20 years, the Belgian socialists are selling out the future of the country.

Basically, the Socialists are supporting an immigration and welfare system to undermine the country, knowing that the course of action that they are taking is a complete disaster.

Maybe if VB stops insisting on separation of Flanders, it could stop this. The natives have to be unified to stop the Socialist Quislings.

Can You Identify Any Nation That Is Truly Democratic?

DavidE ... Your query starts from the premise democracy exists. But, where?

Surely, all we have today is the illusion of democracy. Having an opportunity to vote every 4 years or so does not define or guarantee a democracy. I believe they vote in Nigeria and South Africa but what does that tell us about citizen representation?

Democracy is the will of informed and educated people, as expressed through their elected representatives, and exercised in a purpose built forum. Yet, Europe is awash with left-leaning regimes that only pay lip-service to democratic symbolism, whilst they busy themselves with the implementation of hidden agendas predicated upon their uncompromising ideology.

One of the fundamental mistakes we have made (I believe) is to give the franchise to people who are emotionally unprepared for such responsibilities. In other words, we have devalued the vote. Women under the age of 25, and men under the age of 21, should not be allowed to vote. University students of any age should be barred from voting. Immigrants must wait 10 years.

There are sound psychological and biological reasons for these higher thresholds, and prior to 1930 in Britain, both higher minimum voting ages, and a gender differential, applied. Life wasn't perfect, but at least we had a functioning democracy and Parliament back then. If such "old fashioned" rules were re-applied, we would begin to starve the puerile "trendy" dogmas of their oxygen.

Monopoly

The aim of every Capitalist is to become a Monopolist and exercise Economic Power. The aim of every Socialist is to gain State Power and never to lose it.

To preserve its hold on power and its ability to dispense patronage Socialist regimes always expand the public payroll, co-opt anyone who can deliver block votes, and seek to find a scapegoat who can be blamed for "sabotage" and cajoled into paying tribute.

The true Liberals saw themselves as preventing the Capitalist Monopoly by ensuring Competition and resisting the Socialist Collectivism by keeping the masses happy.

The emergence of Consumerist Democracies has made economic welfare the highest good and now without the embarrassment of Socialist Economics in COMECON the SED type functionaries of the old GDR can focus on cultural conformity and mind control.............on Education to form the New Citizen, on laws to ensure Preferred Behaviour, on a New Cultural Order designed with nothing but loyalty to the Collective.

Belgium's Socialist Party was the one working as an adjunct of the Mafia with its hit-men and corruption and shady dealings............it is a matrix of corruption and obligation to enmesh any threat to its leading position as vanguard of the politicial class determined to be entrenched in the money mines

These are very distubing numbers

If I have the numbers right, then, Muslims now form 7/55 = 13% of elected representatives in Antwerp.

This is stunning! I had not realized the problem had reached this extent. And still most Belgians, and Europeans, deny what is going on in their cities.... In another two elections, with non-muslims fleeing the city, and the muslim population continuing to grow, Antewerp will be in muslim control.

I wonder if higher levels of government realize, or care, about this. Surely they must.

Belgium Test Case

It will be interesting to see what the Muslims do with control once they have it. They have to be careful not to alienate the educated private-sector workers and companies which, if they flee the country, will seriously weaken welfare state finances. If Sharia law or watered-down version of the same were to be imposed, that would probably be the last straw for the educated "ethnic" Belgians, who would certainly follow their Dutch compatriots to greener pastures.

Greener pastures where?

I doubt that Islamists will care much about "preserving the welfare state", except to the extent necessary to prevent political mobilization against them before they achieve power.

Islamic countries are the poorest in the world precisely because dogma overcomes everything else, to the extreme detriment of education, productivity, and commercial success. Prosperity is irrelevant. They will care about power, and do what it takes to achieve it, but once it is achieved....

Where can educated non-muslim Europeans flee to? Has it come already to people planning to flee? Will enough people be willing to fight?

In an equal fight between a group of Islamists accustomed to self-sacrifice (as they demonstrate daily with their lives, and the lives of their women and children, for which they appear to have no regard) vs a bunch of soft Europeans who cannot even now comprehend what is going on, obviously the Islamists will win.

More greener pastures

Australia will have you too, I believe, although I am not sure how much money you have to bring with you.

Beware. The vigourous Australian, very Anglo-Saxon can-do hands-on no-nonsense mindset might not be suitable to the regressing, continually rationalising, psychologically frail, prissy and dilly-dallying mind of the Old World.

Then again, you can't have it all, mate.

Greener pastures

'Where can educated non-muslim Europeans flee to?'

To the Far East (if they'll have you). I did. Physically I left Flanders more than a decade and a half ago but in my head I had left well over a decade before that.

I consider Europe to be no more than a living museum, adrift, uninspired, increasingly collectivist, soft, spiritually stale, ridden with white guilt, misguidedly apologetic (the shameful tribulations around the Crusades are a case in point) and appeasingly bent on self-destruction.

You'll find no sympathy here. Let alone respect.

Europeans

Without Europeans, Europe is just a big, green plot of land. If Europeans all got up and moved to Central Asia, then that region would be an economic powerhouse and Europe would become just another authoritarian Muslim backwater.

Another Example of Muddled Thinking

sonomaca ... your thinking is way too shallow. You have completely overlooked the contribution the environment inevitably makes to the success of any civilization.

Central Asia is already environmentally degraded: the Aral Sea drying up and an expanding Gobi Desert are just two examples. Generally speaking, this huge area is semi-arid and cannot sustain normal farming / food production. Furthermore, the winters are very severe, with temperatures falling to minus 25 degrees Centigrade.

If the Europeans "got up and moved to Central Asia," so to speak, then it would be a disaster for much of the rest of the world also. You have not yet understood just how calamitous any loss of sovereignty by Europeans over European soil will be for humanity, let alone for Western ideals.

VB

If the Vlaams Belang wants to win in 2007, in the federal elections, I think they have to do more to win away VLD voters (the liberal democrats, who lost heavily yesterday). The VB stanch on immigration is well known. What they need is a decent free market economic programme. Unless that is realized, voters will stay with the VLD instead.

@DavidE
I doubt the VB will -ever- stop insisting on separation of Flanders from the artificial body that is Belgium.

" hassle-free Belgian citizenship "

When "rights" are bestowed on those who put in jeopardy the cultural integrity of our society and by their presence impair its cohesion, there is deliberate erosion of the sense of nationhood.

In this light, to confer " hassle-free Belgian citizenship " on those immersed in their own cultures is a violation of the purpose of the law!

We may think that we have no option. But once launched on this course the perversity becomes total when laws are passed on behalf of  Muslim immigrants to take away natural rights from indigenous citizens. We are then plainly in the presence of arbitrary rule.

Could women preferences be an explanation?

That is indeed very worrysome development. As just many other cities Antwerepen is close to be turned into slum. 

But to the overal results: to my knowledge parties like Vlaams Belang usually attract significantly less votes from female voters. This was the case of Austrian Freedom Party one week ago.

And maybe Vlaams Belang should modify its strategy and seek more cooperation with democratic and non-violent parties emerging in Europe ( Sverigedemokraterna, British National Party). I believe that Vlaams Belang could not change the future of its country even in case of victory in the next elections. We all know what happened to Austria after Freedom party electoral success few years ago.

 

Cordon Sanitaire

As long as the "Cordon Sanitaire" exists, the Vlaams Belang party will never succeed. They have to prove themself by becoming part of the governing bodies  (towns, cities etc..) Their strategy should be more aimed at "breaking up" this corrdon sanitaire..Don't they have enough courts in the EU to get that resolved one way or the other..?

By their example, the "average voter" will understand that the VB is more then just an "extreme" right wing party..Only then the voter will support the VB platform..

Key to Socialism

Free money and easy jobs from the Goverment!!! Always a vote getter!  As in Sweden when everyone is on the dole in some way they have a vested interest in maintaining the status quo.  In the US this seems to be changing as more and more people quit the office world and start small businesses.  Even so, pro-business low tax agendas are difficult to get through Congress.

1935

Last Year it was 1934, according to Paul Beliën. It is now clearly 1935.

congratulations, Alexandra Colen, with your results in and around Mol.

I see a new evolution: Where up to some time ago, some people foresaw a 2-party system emerge in Belgium from the Cordon Sanitaire, by all politically correct parties being forced to coagulate against the Vlaams Belang, the possibility now emerges that not a coagulation of traditional parties will form 1 party against the Vlaams Belang, but that all traditional parties except the socialist party will evaporate and that the Vlaams Belang will see itself opposed to only the socialists, which, on top, will not be able anymore to be secular and ecological socialists the way they want and hope according to their post-cold-war ideology in which they still claim the highest morality, but will be transformed into an Islamic party forcing dhimmitude from the indigenous population by just doing that what both socialists and muslims have been doing since their conception: robbing the productive class from 50% of their revenue.

Turning Red...

That's what I'm thinking. There's a scary element to the evolution which I will refer to as the Balkanisation. Most likely the term doesn't quite cover the load. In essence the indigenous population retreats, their numbers decline whilst the government allows more immigrants to poor into the region (populations that expand rapidly). It will 'disrupt' the balance and quite possibly lead to ethnic violence on a larger scale. Immigration as a control weapon, works in Brussels and it will work elsewhere and it will protect the Belgian state as well. The question is: was a battle lost or is the war being lost.