Jihad Against Danish Newspaper
From the desk of Paul Belien on Sat, 2005-10-22 20:25

Islam is no laughing matter. The Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten is being protected by security guards and several cartoonists have gone into hiding after the newspaper published a series of twelve cartoons (see them all here, halfway the article) about the prophet Muhammad. According to the Islam it is blasphemous to make images of the prophet. Muslim fundamentalists have threatened to bomb the paper’s offices and kill the cartoonists.
The newspaper published the cartoons when a Danish author complained that he could find no-one to illustrate his book about Muhammad. Jyllands-Posten wondered whether there were more cases of self-censorship regarding Islam in Denmark and asked twelve illustrators to draw the prophet for them. Carsten Juste, the paper’s editor, said the cartoons were a test of whether the threat of Islamic terrorism had limited the freedom of expression in Denmark.
The publication led to outrage among the Muslim immigrants living in Denmark. 5,000 of them took to the streets to protest. Muslim organisations have demanded an apology, but Juste rejects this idea: “We live in a democracy. That’s why we can use all the journalistic methods we want to. Satire is accepted in this country, and you can make caricatures,” he said. The Danish imam Raed Hlayhel reacted with the statement: “This type of democracy is worthless for Muslims. Muslims will never accept this kind of humiliation. The article has insulted every Muslim in the world.”
Flemming Rose, the cultural editor at the newspaper, denied that the purpose had been to provoke Muslims. It was simply a reaction to the rising number of situations where artists and writers censored themselves out of fear of radical Islamists, he said. “Religious feelings cannot demand special treatment in a secular society,” he added. “In a democracy one must from time to time accept criticism or becoming a laughingstock.”
The affair, however, has also led to a diplomatic incident. On Thursday the ambassadors of eleven Muslim countries, including Indonesia, a number of Arab states, Pakistan, Iran, and Bosnia-Herzegovina, complained about the cartoons in a letter to Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen. They say the publication of the cartoons is a “provocation” and demand apologies from the newspaper.
Jyllands-Posten was also included on an al-Qaeda website listing possible terrorist targets. An organisation which calls itself “The Glorious Brigades in Northern Europe” is circulating pictures on the internet which show bombs exploding over pictures of the newspaper and blood flowing over the national flag of Denmark. “The Mujahedeen have numerous targets in Denmark – very soon you all will regret this,” the website says.
Meanwhile in Brussels a young Muslim immigrant published a poster depicting the Virgin Mary with naked breasts. Though the picture has drawn some protest from Catholics (though not from Western embassies, nor from the bishops), this artist need not fear being murdered in the street. On the contrary, he is being subsidised by the Ministry for Culture.
Updates:
Cartoon Case Escalates into International Crisis, 27 October 2005
Out of the Iranian Frying Pan into the Danish Fire, 29 October 2005
Pigs Do Not Fly, 17 November 2005
Bounty Offered for Murdering Cartoonists, 4 December 2005
UN to Investigate Racism of Danish Cartoonists, 7 December 2005
Dispatch from the Eurabian Front, 9 December 2005
Europe Criticises Copenhagen over Cartoons, 21 December 2005
Cartoon Case: EU and UN Call Denmark to Account, 28 December 2005
Danish Cartoon Affair: Letter from a Muslim, 31 December 2005
Danish Muslims Divided over Cartoon Affair, 8 January 2006
Danish Prime Minister Shocked at Lies, 11 January 2006
Scandinavian Update: Israeli Boycott, Muslim Cartoons, 14 January 2006
Denmark: Moderate Muslims Oppose Imams, 19 January 2006
Danish Imams Propose to End Cartoon Case, 22 January 2006
European Appeasement Reinforces Muslim Extremism, 24 January 2006
Norway Apologizes over Muhammad Cartoons, 27 January 2006
Cartoon Paper Justifies Itself to Saudis, 29 January 2006
Cartoon Rage: Vikings Warned to Leave Palestine, 30 January 2006
Buy Danish. Nothing Rotten in the State of Denmark, 30 January 2006
Danish Paper Apologizes. Dutch Cartoon on Its Way, 31 January 2006
Take Note Cardiff: We Are All Danes Now, 1 February 2006
France Soir Backs Down. Others Stand Firm, 2 February 2006
"The War Is On", 3 February 2006
British Appease While Moderate Muslims Speak Out, 4 February 2006
Cartoon War Leads to Role Reversal, Makes First Victim, 4 February 2006
Danish Muslims Rebel Against Imams, 5 February 2006
Appeasing Oslo Strikes at Press, Al-Guardian Strikes at Danes, 7 February 2006
The Cartoon Hoax, 7 February 2006
BBC Admits Fatal Negligence, 7 February 2006
Cartoons in Egypt Last October, 9 February 2006
Some Light in the Darkness, 10 February 2006
More and More Moderate Muslims Speak Out in Denmark, 13 February 2006
Muslims Create Islamophobes, Then Want Islamophobes Punished, 14 February 2006
Dutch Vexed with Solana. Europeans Quarrel over Cartoons, 16 February 2006
Jesus Christ Sacks Minister over Muhammad, 18 February 2006
Dairy Producer Who Boycotted Israel Gets Boycotted by Muslims, 19 February 2006
Turkey on Collision Course with Europe, Demands Danish Apologies, 24 February 2006
Turkey Denies Demanding Danish Apologies. Finns Fire Editor, 25 February 2006
Danish Cartoons International, 2 March 2006
Cartoon Case: Denmark Will Not Prosecute, 16 March 2006
Muslims Take Cartoon Case to UN's "Allah" Commission, 18 March 2006
“Danish Queen Masterminded Muhammad Cartoon Affair”, 2 October 2006
Danish Victory: Radical Imam Leaves! 10 November 2006
Let the “House of War” Prepare for War, 14 February 2008
Media is said to have
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2005-11-15 18:53.
Media is said to have freedom of speech, ok check this out, "911 the greatest lie ever sold" is a film documentary that questions the legality and truth about this incident.
Muhammed Cartoons Link Missing
Submitted by Dave Mann (not verified) on Mon, 2005-11-07 23:40.
Some (self?) Censorship has taken place. The link to all 12 cartoons is now MISSING!
DEMOCRACY PEOPLE
Submitted by Mohamed (not verified) on Tue, 2005-11-15 10:05.
Why are the links for the Photos of Muhammad Missing
Meanwhile the link to Holy Mary Working
What a democracy point of view!!!!!!
This is a pure JEW Work JOB , to show how a guy injured a soldier by bombing himself
ISLAMIC TERROR , and to hide how they rape and kill millions of children and old people
POOOR JEWS :)
Is this to raise up the points against islam?
Or this to make all christians and jews talk and muslims have no world
COME ON GET REAL
PERFECT DEMOCRACY
Disgusting pictures?
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sun, 2005-10-30 21:54.
http://pics.jp.dk/nybillede/default.asp?id=2253&pixid=31801
And just what is so "disgusting" about that picture? Many of the other artists, I agree, were making statements about the penalty for making a picture of Muhammad, but this first one was simply answering the request of an illustration for a children's book about Muhammad. Of course, if just making a picture of any sort should be "blasphemy" and punishable by law, well, then...
Well, what we call disgracefull.
Submitted by Invisible Silence (not verified) on Mon, 2005-10-31 01:31.
With the respect to above posted comment by the brother, I humbly state that I consider such images not only against social ethics but also as a fuel to social disagreement and blasphemy. Each and every ideology exists in this world has couple of people as ideals and those ideologies submit all the regards that they could muster to those ideals, if we all want to survive with peace and love, we should avoid hitting each other's ideals, most of us, almost all of us are idealistic to some extent and consider a person or a group of persons as totems, and do not want to listen, see or observe any disgrace subjected to our totems. Thence, I believe, in the name of peace and love, we should avoid such literature, and one whose so ever fuels such blasphemy, may be critisized and may be rejected in society.
Democracy does not mean
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Fri, 2006-02-03 08:31.
Democracy does not mean printing cartoons just for the sole reason to inflaming people of a certain relgious background. It is clear that the cartoonist main aim was to insult the muslim population. Those cartoons are insulting, and the Danish government should apologize. Shame on those of you who are for intolerance. Democracy does not mean being anti muslim, which these cartoons are.
I am impressed!
Submitted by Christian Boy (not verified) on Mon, 2005-10-31 01:39.
Well Bob, laws and punishments are made by social agreement, and I am not the one to decide what maximum punishment should be for such acts, but whatever, I submit to that guy Invisible Silence, I think that he is right and so logical at his words, we human beings should learn to respect each other's viewpoint even if we hold a contradictive or paradoxial viewpoint. We should keep our contradictive viewpoint at home with us instead of throwing it on the others face. I encourage Invisible Silence to voice his views, because I think that if such social thinking gets established, then we all will be able to live with peace, and love.
Unimpressed
Submitted by Bob Doney on Mon, 2005-10-31 10:44.
Should we have applied this "don't interfere and insult totemic leaders who inspire adulation" principle to Hitler, Stalin and Mao, for example?
One person's ideal is another's nightmare.
Bob Doney
Respectable Bob Doney.
Submitted by Invisible Silence (not verified) on Mon, 2005-10-31 16:51.
My humble regards may be granted acceptance, sorry to address you directly in this comment area, as well as sorry to state that this humble neophyte believes learned respectable haven't considered the scenario of sentences, This naive one has used the term "Ideology", and the context was "religious". Please consider, if you be so kind enough.
Respectably speaking
Submitted by Bob Doney on Mon, 2005-10-31 20:56.
This naive one has used the term "Ideology", and the context was "religious". Please consider, if you be so kind enough.
To me it's irrelevant whether I'm being tortured, starved or killed in the name of religion, ideology or party politics. A bad idea is a bad idea, and a wicked leader is a wicked leader. And some good leaders are followed by a lot of wicked people.
Thanks for calling me "respectable". It's the nicest thing anyone's said about me for a while now!
May peace and blessings be showered upon you.
Bob Doney
I am agreed.
Submitted by Invisible Silence (not verified) on Tue, 2005-11-01 05:41.
Certianly, a lot of wicked people claim to follow some good leaders, and they bring no good for humanity but jinx; I agree dear learned respectable, yet is it moral to make a joke of those good leaders instead of those deserving wicked people? Please enlighten this poor naivete.
The Cartoons, why accept them as Muhamamd ?
Submitted by Invisible Silence (not verified) on Sun, 2005-10-30 17:05.
Simple, whatever the facts are or whatever muslims, jews, hindus or christians are doing out there, isn't related to these cartoons. I think that if any one makes a disgusting picture and names it Jesus, I am not going to accept that this is the image of Jesus, because in my religious point of view, Jesus is most respected person and that disgusting image has nothing to do with him, similarly, muslims should understand, and those disgusting images has nothing to do with Muhamamd nor they are actual images of Muhammad, whereas Muhammad as a prophet holds much respect and he can never be compared or defined by such disgusting people. Yet, anyways, I hate those people who pull jinx upon others by disgusting their respected persons or deities, they shouldn't do that, and if they do, it won't be called democracy but blasphemy.
Nice viewpoint, Invisible Silence
Submitted by Christian Boy (not verified) on Sun, 2005-10-30 17:13.
I am feeling great by reading your comment, alas if only all the human beings could be that logical and think like you. I believe that you are so right in here, and I also state the same that if anyone disgraces others religious feeling, or bring such output as these cartoons, that person could never be called a democratic but blasphemer, should be panalized and sentenced to maximum punishment possible under the law.
Maximum sentence
Submitted by Bob Doney on Sun, 2005-10-30 22:13.
sentenced to maximum punishment possible under the law.
What did you have in mind? Three years' probation? Five thousand lashes? Or perhaps beheading with a sword?
Bob Doney
Actually , the main problem
Submitted by Omran (not verified) on Fri, 2005-10-28 09:46.
Actually , the main problem seems that this Journal/artists/employees doesn't know about prophit Mohammad .
As moslems , we do respect all prophits .
This is real shame on Danish media to allow such material .
The Cartoonists - sorry for the spelling i'm Dane
Submitted by C Møller - Århus - Denmark (not verified) on Fri, 2005-10-28 08:31.
Well, for starts, I would like to tell you, that the initial invitation went out to 40 cartoonists, to draw a picture of Muhammed, but only 12 dared to reply.
Why is the European socity so willing to kissup to the muslims whom lives here? What have they done to justefy this?
Look at the jews: They have fit thair religion into the socity, in wich they live, and keeps most of thair religious acts at home, and mainly only on fridays you see them wearing religious cloathing in public. In the meentime the muslims demand special treatment and favours so that our countrys must fit thair belifs and waluenorms.
I am in the meaning, that if they can't fit into OUR socitys, they should not have left thair own, and that ALL that can go to the home-region, on hollyday or "re-education", should be expelled from Europe, as they pose a large thread to OUR way of life.
C Møller - Århus - Denmark
Your email showed other
Submitted by Tanner van Putten (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 04:09.
Your email showed other people how ignorate we are regarding other culture and reliogon. We should respect other people traditions, reliogon and culture. The Jews you are talking about were disceminated and tortured in Europe exactly the same as what is happening to Muslims right now. Respect and acceptance of other people is the KEY.
Ignorant !!!
Racism
Submitted by Aman (not verified) on Wed, 2006-01-11 04:11.
C Møller - Århus
If I were living in the same country with racialists and Nazis like you , I would certainly think about moving to any other part of the earth as quickly as possible.
Read what you have written, to see how ugly it is.
It shows how intolerant
Submitted by Black (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-25 09:03.
It shows how intolerant Europeans are. That is disgusting. And after all of this they wonder why muslims do not respect westners and their culture. When your culture is to mock other's belief why do you expect respect and tolarance towards you? You speak about democracy: democracy does not mean to insult others. Yo speak about Islamic terrorism: terrorism is to invade others land and kill them, humilate them. The only one who invade others is the West and the only countries which are invaded are muslims. The only one who humilate others is the Westners and the only people are humiliated are muslims. You are just a bunch of hypocrits.
Do I hope that Europeans will understand me? No, dumb can never understand others, because he is blind by his dumbness and can not see anything except his nose.
Europe is tolerant
Submitted by Trok (not verified) on Fri, 2006-02-03 07:59.
These pictures were not published in a muslim country. You can publish comic drawings on god aswell.
Muslims think their religion is a peaceful one, but yet the first response to all conflict situations is to use force and violence (Palestinian gunmen invading EU office for example).
I know muslims are very religious, but would it be the time to loosen up a bit, it's 2005 afterall. This kind of fanaticism is the main destabilising force in the middle-east and one of the main reasons why the living conditions in some areas there are as bad as they are.
Muslims, like Palestinians for example, seem eager to make generalisations aswell. The west is allways blamed for generalising, but muslims are even more eager to do so. Here they instantly blamed whole EU for intolerance. Europe has been allmost the only western block, which has shown respect and tried to help the muslims by resisting wars like we have now in Iraq. Europe has also accepted muslim immigrants and funded the Palestinian government for a long time.
Palestinians, however, throw that kind of friendship into the waste bin just like that when there's a problem tho. That must indicate how much they appreciate friends in general.
Have you every stopped and tought about how many people have been slaughtered in the name of religion by both christians and muslims. Religion has been the main destabilising and violence causing factor in the world, even tho it is supposed to give people security and endorse peace and co-existance.
Most christians seems to have gotten over this ultra-fanatic thinking and that has come with the general raise in the level of education, altho there are some still around.
My main point here is: Lighten Up! Using violence as first means of "diplomacy" just shows how civilized you really are.
Cartoons are funny... not reasons to kill
Submitted by Derek (not verified) on Fri, 2006-02-03 05:58.
How is it that its ok to say you want to kill people because made some cartoons? Westerners are supposed to be so barbaric but yet you have savage idiots cutting off people's heads while screaming priase to Allah??? I can't believe any God would want his followers to murder and kill. Wait come to think of it I can... Is Allah really the code name for Satan???
You say we are hypocrites...
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2006-01-31 22:12.
You say we are hypocrites... What would you call the people who are offended by the cartoons, but still does the excact same to the danish people? I can understand you are offended, but does that make it right to burn our flag and pictures of our prime minister?
Do as we say or... <**BOOM**>
The Encyclopedia Brittanica says that "Mohammad is the most succ
Submitted by nermin on Tue, 2006-01-31 22:17.
The Encyclopedia Brittanica says that "Mohammad is the most successful of all Prophets and religious personalities".
What non-Muslims Say About Him
Submitted by nermin on Tue, 2006-01-31 22:21.
What non-Muslims Say About Him (2)
During the centuries of the crusades, all sorts of slanders were invented against Prophet Muhammad (pbuh). But with the birth of the modern age, marked with religious tolerance and freedom of thought, there has been a great change in the approach of Western authors in their delineation of his life and character. The views of some non-Muslim scholars regarding Prophet Muhammad, given at the end, justify this opinion.
But the West has still to go a step forward to discover the greatest reality about Muhammad and that is his being the true and the last Prophet of God for the whole humanity. In spite of all its objectivity and enlightenment there has been no sincere and objective attempt by the West to understand the Prophethood of Muhammad (pbuh). It is so strange that very glowing tributes are paid to him for his integrity and achievement but his claim of being the Prophet of God has been rejected explicitly or implicitly. It is here that a searching of the heart is required, and a review of the so-called objectivity is needed. The following glaring facts from the life of Muhammad (pbuh) have been furnished to facilitate an unbiased, logical and objective decision regarding his Prophethood.
Up to the age of forty, Muhammad was not known as a statesman, a preacher or an orator. He was never seen discussing the principles of metaphysics, ethics, law, politics, economics or sociology. No doubt he possessed an excellent character, charming manners and was highly cultured. Yet there was nothing so deeply striking and so radically extraordinary in him that would make men expect something great and revolutionary from him in the future. But when he came out of the Cave (HIRA) with a new message, he was completely transformed. Is it possible for such a person of the above qualities to turn all of a sudden into 'an impostor' and claim to be the Prophet of Allah and invite all the rage of his people? One might ask: for what reason did he suffer all those hardships? His people offered to accept him as their King and he would leave the preaching of his religion. But he chose to refuse their tempting offers and go on preaching his religion single-handedly in face of all kinds of insults, social boycott and even physical assault by his own people. Was it not only God's support and his firm will to disseminate the message of Allah and his deep-rooted belief that ultimately Islam would emerge as the only way of life for humanity, that he stood like a mountain in the face of all opposition and conspiracies to eliminate him? Furthermore, had he come with a design of rivalry with the Christians and the Jews, why should he have made belief in Jesus Christ and Moses and other Prophets of God (peace be upon them), a basic requirement of faith without which no one could be a Muslim?
Is it not an incontrovertible proof of his Prophethood that in spite of being unlettered and having led a very normal and quiet life for forty years, when he began preaching his message, all of Arabia stood in awe and wonder and was bewitched by his wonderful eloquence and oratory? It was so matchless that the whole legion of Arab poets, preachers and orators of the highest calibre failed to bring forth its equivalent. And above all, how could he then pronounce truths of a scientific nature contained in the Qur'an that no other human being could possible have developed at that time?
Last but not least, why did he lead a hard life even after gaining power and authority? Just ponder over the words he uttered while dying: "We the community of the Prophets are not inherited. Whatever we leave is for charity."
As a matter of fact, Muhammad (pbuh) is the last link of the chain of Prophets sent in different lands and times since the very beginning of the human life on this planet. Read the following writings of the Western authors:
"If greatness of purpose, smallness of means, and astounding results are the three criteria of human genius, who could dare to compare any great man in modern history with Muhammad? The most famous men created arms, laws and empires only. They founded, if anything at all, no more than material powers which often crumbled away before their eyes. This man moved not only armies, legislations, empires, peoples and dynasties, but millions of men in one-third of the then inhabited world; and more than that, he moved the altars, the gods, the religions, the ideas, the beliefs and souls. . . his forbearance in victory, his ambition, which was entirely devoted to one idea and in no manner striving for an empire; his endless prayers, his mystic conversations with God, his death and his triumph after death; all these attest not to an imposture but to a firm conviction which gave him the power to restore a dogma. This dogma was twofold, the unity of God and the immateriality of God; the former telling what God is, the latter telling what God is not; the one overthrowing false gods with the sword, the other starting an idea with words.
"Philosopher, orator, apostle, legislator, warrior, conqueror of ideas, restorer of rational dogmas, of a cult without images; the founder of twenty terrestrial empires and of one spiritual empire, that is Muhammad. As regards all standards by which human greatness may be measured, we may well ask, is there any man greater than he?"
Lamartine, HISTOIRE DE LA TURQUIE, Paris, 1854, Vol. II, pp. 276-277.
"It is not the propagation but the permanency of his religion that deserves our wonder, the same pure and perfect impression which he engraved at Mecca and Medina is preserved, after the revolutions of twelve centuries by the Indian, the African and the Turkish proselytes of the Koran. . . The Mahometans have uniformly withstood the temptation of reducing the object of their faith an devotion to a level with the senses and imagination of man. 'I believe in One God and Mahomet the Apostle of God' is the simple and invariable profession of Islam. The intellectual image of the Deity has never been degraded by any visible idol; the honours of the prophet have never transgressed the measure of human virtue, and his living precepts have restrained the gratitude of his disciples within the bounds of reason and religion."
Edward Gibbon and Simon Ocklay, HISTORY OF THE SARACEN EMPIRE, London, 1870, p. 54.
"He was Caesar and Pope in one; but he was Pope without Pope's pretensions, Caesar without the legions of Caesar: without a standing army, without a bodyguard, without a palace, without a fixed revenue; if ever any man had the right to say that he ruled by the right divine, it was Mohammed, for he had all the power without its instruments and without its supports."
Bosworth Smith, MOHAMMAD AND MOHAMMADANISM, London, 1874, p. 92.
"It is impossible for anyone who studies the life and character of the great Prophet of Arabia, who knows how he taught and how he lived, to feel anything but reverence for that mighty Prophet, one of the great messengers of the Supreme. And although in what I put to you I shall say many things which may be familiar to many, yet I myself feel whenever I re-read them, a new way of admiration, a new sense of reverence for that mighty Arabian teacher."
Annie Besant, THE LIFE AND TEACHINGS OF MUHAMMAD, Madras,1932, p. 4.
"His readiness to undergo persecutions for his beliefs, the high moral character of the men who believed in him and looked up to him as leader, and the greatness of his ultimate achievement - all argue his fundamental integrity. To suppose Muhammad an impostor raises more problems than it solves. Moreover, none of the great figures of history is so poorly appreciated in the West as Muhammad."
W. Montgomery Watt, MOHAMMAD AT MECCA, Oxford, 1953, p. 52.
"Muhammad, the inspired man who founded Islam, was born about A.D. 570 into an Arabian tribe that worshipped idols. Orphaned at birth, he was always particularly solicitous of the poor and needy, the widow and the orphan, the slave and the downtrodden. At twenty, he was already a successful businessman, and soon became director of camel caravans for a wealthy widow. When he reached twenty-five, his employer, recognizing his merit, proposed marriage. Even though she was fifteen years older, he married her, and as long as she lived, remained a devoted husband.
"Like almost every major prophet before him, Muhammad fought shy of serving as the transmitter of God's word, sensing his own inadequacy. But the angel commanded "Read." So far as we know, Muhammad was unable to read or write, but he began to dictate those inspired words which would soon revolutionize a large segment of the earth: "There is one God."
"In all things Muhammad was profoundly practical. When his beloved son Ibrahim died, an eclipse occurred, and rumours of God's personal condolence quickly arose. Whereupon Muhammad is said to have announced, "An eclipse is a phenomenon of nature. It is foolish to attribute such things to the death or birth of a human being." "At Muhammad's own death an attempt was made to deify him, but the man who was to become his administrative successor killed the hysteria with one of the noblest speeches in religious history: "If there are any among you who worshipped Muhammad, he is dead. But if it is God you worshipped, He lives forever."
James A. Michener, "ISLAM: THE MISUNDERSTOOD RELIGION," in READER'S DIGEST (American edition), May 1955, pp. 68-70.
"My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world's most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular level."
Michael H. Hart, THE 100: A RANKING OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL PERSONS IN HISTORY, New York: Hart Publishing Company, Inc., 1978, p. 33.
Sir George Bernard Shaw says about islam
Submitted by nermin on Tue, 2006-01-31 22:30.
Sir George Bernard Shaw in 'The Genuine Islam,' Vol. 1, No. 8, 1936
"If any religion had the chance of ruling over England, nay Europe within the next hundred years, it could be Islam."
"I have always held the religion of Muhammad in high estimation because of its wonderful vitality. It is the only religion which appears to me to possess that assimilating capacity to the changing phase of existence which can make itself appeal to every age. I have studied him - the wonderful man and in my opinion far from being an anti-Christ, he must be called the Savior of Humanity."
"I believe that if a man like him were to assume the dictatorship of the modern world he would succeed in solving its problems in a way that would bring it the much needed peace and happiness: I have prophesied about the faith of Muhammad that it would be acceptable to the Europe of tomorrow as it is beginning to be acceptable to the Europe of today."
The West is NOT intolerant
Submitted by Republican on Sat, 2005-10-29 20:09.
Let's agree to exchange our ideas instead of just arguing. That would be pointess, and non-productive.
You say that the West invades other lands and humiliates them.
When the U.S. freed France from Nazi occupation, did the French feel "humiliated"? No. Of course not. Why should you?
What should embarrass Muslims is the fact that all these Middle Eastern governments never say a word while evil dictators like Saddam kill millions of his fellow Muslims. Where is your outrage at that?
The U.S. saved millions of Muslim lives by intervening in places where Muslims were being killed by their own governments, places like Kosovo, Bosnia, Somalia, Iraq, Afghanistan. Face the facts: the U.S. has saved millions of Muslims!
Let me know what you think. Can you agree with what I have said?
The States and Muslims saved.
Submitted by Esam K. Shaat (not verified) on Fri, 2006-02-03 10:22.
I just want you to consider other people beliefs and visions. Do not allow that brain wash by the west media lead you towards fony ideas. In fact America have slaughtered millions of muslim people JUST to
"liberate Baghdad" and never been able to restore peace or order. have you ever seen or read about what is happenning in Abo Ghareib prison or in Guantanamo?.. How could you ignore this? God, such blind and biased vision that really shock me when read your line.
Just need some one sane here to feel the truth not to repeat what the TV has told him. Those in the prisons, are not they Muslims?
I believe that you refused to argue, I feel the same. There is no enough space to discuss that now. Any way, I do not believe in what you have written or In America's intetions whatsoever.
Regards,
Esam Shaat
No,I do not agree.First off
Submitted by Aj (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 23:24.
No,I do not agree.First off the US bombed Iraq indiscriminatly and killed millions more than Saddam did.Also,the US financed Saddam's war against Iran thus killing more Muslims.How about the Muslims be killed in Isreal.The US did not bomb France it only liberated it.As for Bosnia, the US purposely waited until a large majority of Muslim were murdered before it acted.There are more incidents of the West killing Muslims than saving them.
I advice uropean to have an
Submitted by Abdoon (not verified) on Mon, 2006-01-23 07:28.
I advice uropean to have an open-mind and they should read their history. This will be usefull for them to understand the hidden hands of Jewish. Let them read, also, Protocols Of Zion، which jewish applied on both Cristian Uropeans and Muslims. The fact is much terrible than what BLIND people (rabble) can see. Saddam, as any evil wicked citizen among good people, was lead by US and the hidden hands (like most of the middle-east leaders) to insult their nations. DON'T TAKE IT AN EXECUSE TO INSULT INNOCENT PEOPLE MORE! PLEASE!
"The U.S. saved millions of Muslim lives"??
It is not a truth! Go back to the very recent very near history (from Yesterday back-to the invasion day) to see what happened in Abu-Ghareeb and what is happening now!
See Afghanistan also!
U.S. did not came to save, IT CAME TO STEAL!
Regards;
Abu Ghraib facts....
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 17:42.
A total of TWO Iraqi's were killed in Abu Ghraib by US forces in three years. In comparison, 140 Iraqi's were killed on January 5th of this year by insurgents.
that proves that in iraq, muslims are killing more muslims than the US and all its allies are.
How many iraqi's were killed at Abu Ghraib by saddam who is also a muslim?
Open mind
Submitted by Bob Doney on Mon, 2006-01-23 23:48.
I advice uropean to have an open-mind and they should read their history.
I advise Abdoon to do the same.
Bob Doney
Muslims/Mohammad
Submitted by Maria (not verified) on Wed, 2006-01-25 16:37.
Deport Muslims and your problems are solved. It's the only way. They can't change, the quran calls for their horrible behaviour. They are following Mohammad. Violence is Islam. It says so in the Quran.
you would benefit if you read
Submitted by a muslim (not verified) on Sat, 2006-01-28 19:55.
just wanna tell u a tiny fact, having some muslims acting agressively doesnt mean that all muslims are intolerant & bloody.....this is not a way to talk about a religion...among christians too there are saints and murderers,,,we re all humans, being a muslim doesnt mean being made fun of & u didnt make fun of one of us, u made fun of our most important symbol, muhamed-salla allah 3aleih w salem- told us treat you christians, or whatever u are, tolerantly, if a minority does against this, its not all muslims fault, by the way MARIA if you only read one line of our quraan, you ll see its not ''HORRIBLE'' as you said, its gods words just like your bible, if you are a real christian at all,,,read about our prophet & what he said & then talk, acting like a fools is not a way of expressing your opinion
Islam a sensitive religion
Submitted by Choong (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 08:10.
Islam and Muslim is synonimous with intolerant and narrow world view, they will argue all the goodnes of the faith but forgot to mention the bloody murderous conquest and force submission in the past.I am not saying that Christianity is too good either as history has shown but we cant also dismiss the contribution of world civilisation by Western culture either, so then one would have to ask, what is/has Islam and Muslim contributed to the world until today.Muslim will argue that Islam is not what you seems to be, well anyone can argue the same for thier native religion too, so i am asking why there are negative outlook upon non Muslim in the Quran with some sense of hate in it, aren't we named as "kafir" who is just better than animals? And if Islam is a real peaceful religion, then why it all end up what we see today, fact is facts, and in the universal protocol of emblem and logo, we can also see a pair of cross sword in the Arabian flag today, still a "peaceful" religion? It seems to me Islam is more an ideology than a spiritual path.
Choong
Islam is not a "religion of peace". Who said this?
Submitted by Adriane (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 08:37.
Said the Ayatollah Khomeini, "All those who study jihad will understand why Islam wants to conquer the world . . . Those who know nothing about Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. [They] are witless!"
Andrew Bostom: The Legacy of Jihad.
to adrian
Submitted by bashar on Sat, 2006-02-04 08:04.
khomaini said also if i can biuld a big wall between my nation and teh west i will do
to stop this rotten west society..
Deportation
Submitted by Bob Doney on Thu, 2006-01-26 13:11.
They can't change, the quran calls for their horrible behaviour. They are following Mohammad. Violence is Islam.
This ignores the slightly inconvenient fact that most Muslims live peaceful and peaceable lives.
Bob Doney
Allies
Submitted by Bob Doney on Sun, 2005-10-30 11:52.
When the U.S. freed France from Nazi occupation
I think it would be politer to say "the U.S. and her allies", or even (let's stretch a point), just "the Allies".
Bob Doney
democracy does not mean to insult others ?
Submitted by Spartacus (not verified) on Fri, 2005-10-28 09:20.
Democracy is exactly the right to insult others !!
Only if you are able to have different opinions, even when they are contrasting opinions - and yes, insulting opinions ! - and find a way to deal with that in a civilized manner, are you able to speak of a democracy !!!
Hypocriscy
Submitted by bordergal (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-25 15:45.
Yes, Muslim countries are such bastions of freedom and tolerance, aren't they? I'm sure I could walk down the street in Riyadh with a bible, no problem. I'm also sure that the elderly female Coptic nun who was stabbed recently in Egypt would also agree with you. Sarc on/
I also suggest that you look around the world, 99% of the conflicts on Planet Earth today are Muslims who can't get along with their neighbors.
Oh, that's right. It's always someone else's fault! It couldn't be anything that that Muslims have done, like beheading peaceful elderly buddhist monks, murdering farmers working peacefully in their fields, cutting the throats of an Indian family in Kashmir (including the children), and so on.
BTW, if you can't deal with living in a society that is free to question, mock, ridicule, discuss, criticize, open to multiple ways of living, and so on, maybe you're not tough enough to live in western society.
Maybe you should think about why nobody likes you.
islam is neither arabic nor belong to arab-dont hurt others
Submitted by m cheng ho on Sat, 2006-02-04 22:49.
what was the problem in this matter for Muslims follower is that their religion has used as propaganda in making generalization toward islamic society. I can understand that when we talk about islam people in western countries always imagine to Middle East. No, islam everywhere in the world, even in china like me, and like christian you also can still find islamic countries where there is a respect among religion. Malaysia, brunai and Indonesia are among the countries that majority are muslims but they managed to live in peace despite terrorism groups are trying to disrupt the peace. We know that arabic countries have their own stuff going on, but it can't be applied to other muslim society in many parts of the world.
Is that ok to blame catholic if IRA involve in terrorism? is it ok to blame protestant if George W.Bush decided the war on iraq that caused the death of civillians? is that ok to blame the entire jews when the israel attacks palestine's civillian ? or is it ok to blame islam when a stupid guy killed Van Gohg, suicide bombers and other forms of terror? Religion never told that why unless you are using your own way interpretation to be cruel that you try to justify your action with the word of the holybook. As same as when you try to justify the act of free speech and freedom of the press but ignore the journalism ethic and code of conduct for the press to not involve in the description of racism, hate message, streotype etc. Can someone one in the name of free speech says "f##k you muslims or christian or Hindu" in the newspaper? yeah they can especially in their on paper, but form the ecthical perspective it's wrongdoing.
There was the guy name kumar said that islam is not a religion, it's a cruel platform of belief. well, isn't he also cruel by judging a certain religion without even trying to explore the other sides of religion and trying to know the truth about islam. What happend in India when Hindu orthodoc destroyed mosques in India? what happened when spain force muslim to convert or kill them in andalusia?
there were tragedy, there are occuring and it will be more in the future if we are not trying to solve the problem together with understanding and respect to all beliefs and think without emotional, then try to spread democracy world wide.
cheng ho
hi
Submitted by jawad (not verified) on Mon, 2006-01-23 10:58.
Im jawad 27 years old
Im christian living in Jordan(beside israel)
My country is islamic country,i feel sick of islam and before a couple of months the terrorists explode three hotels in the capital Amman for the name of the big lier Mohammad..
there are many christians living in Jordan , about 2% of the all people in Jordan..
For me Im sick of islam , they are liers liers liers liers, they must wake up ...i dont hate people,but this relegion will lead them to terror and hell..
Jesus Bless you all..
bye
poor jawad
Submitted by there is only one GOD (not verified) on Thu, 2006-02-02 11:34.
hi jawad, i just wondering..how can your jesus save and bless you, if he can save and bless him self???
so strange jawad!!!!!
Submitted by fatima ali (not verified) on Mon, 2006-01-30 01:13.
you said that you are living in jordon! right. why are so prejudiced over muslims and why are u so sick of them? if someone from the west said so i wouldnt be astonished. but you r living with muslims and u certinly know that all these bombing and killings that some misguided muslims did are not out of the core of islam. you r living their and you know how all muslims all over the world condemn these mistaken deeds. so be respectable and dont abuse islam and the prohet muhammad cause he is God's messenger like the prophet jesus peace be upon them all. finally, could u please read about islam from its reliable sources and then come to write your comment! just be fair.
Coward Jawad in Jordan
Submitted by Sadeddin (not verified) on Fri, 2006-01-27 20:06.
To Mr. Jawad it is realy shame on you to see so about muslims and prophet mohammad.
In Jordan Christians live in avery good conditions. They even have rights and high positions in the governement. You need to be sick of your sick mind. You should be thankful to prophet mohammad that you live in peace with all muslims rights in a muslim country.
Your comments shows how much your are selfish hatered and coward.
wala jawad first remember
Submitted by bashar dannaoui (not verified) on Wed, 2006-01-25 21:35.
wala jawad first remember you are a christian you should not hate i hit you on you on the right sheek you should give me the left do not hate isnt what your jesus told you.......do not hate islam besides why you do not leave jordan to denmark maybe because you hate islam they might give you a free entran a the danish nationality bur be carefull they might coonfuse you witha barbarian muslim from jordan becuase if you are not quiete enough blond forget it for them you are also terorist e try my dear non muslim friend
allah akbar aleik wa ala koul wahed mouthlak
Unfair
Submitted by Aman (not verified) on Wed, 2006-01-11 04:09.
bordergal
In all these conflicts that you have written about, both Muslims and non Muslims are being killed , so why don't you see the whole picture. The only explanation for this is that you are really a " DEMOCRATIC " person.
Individuals make mistakes, and sometimes crimes, but religions like Islam decrease the numbers of these bad thing among their followers, and not the opposite
let look at the all
Submitted by observer (not verified) on Wed, 2005-10-26 00:53.
let look at the all :conflictong" moslem countres:
Afganistan:hmmm war there was started by chrsitna countries .soviets and usa,before their political game there was a great peace in afgansitan.
Look at to Irak,if i am not mistaken USA recently had invaded it and turn it to second afganistan,(stange that afganistan was not enough for americans). Look ak to palestine,its israilis who invaded them and since there is no peace,what about barbaric christian crasuaders form middle ages who had slaugtered thousands of moslems and jews?
hey let's just get a couple
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2006-01-31 05:28.
hey let's just get a couple a nukes together and clear that whole area between Israel and India .... then we will have world peace...
Let's Talk...
Submitted by Linda (not verified) on Tue, 2006-01-31 11:35.
Actually you would be wrong to assume that people in the middle east approve of all the beheadings. It is rather ignorant of you to assume so..simply for the mere fact that a large proportion of these people that were killed in these terrorist acts were BOTH muslim AND arab, and that they only reason they were beheaded was because a bunch of psycopaths sentenced them to death because they were trying to make a living by working for the U.S. armed forces in Iraq.
No I do not know what the fuss is with all these cartoons, but I totally understand why muslims would feel offended by the cartoons; the one depicting the prophet with a bomb on his turban. Now come on you guys..that WAS offensive anyway you put it!
Now I've personally seen a lot of cartoon and tv shows ridiculing the christ and jewish people, and I also DO find them rather offensive. Was the muslim reaction exaggerated? most probably..but you cannot ignore the fact that eventhough jyllands-posten excercised their law-protected right of freedom of expression, they DID exercise it rather too freely. As I am quite sure that it was never their intention to offend anyone.
To be honest I am quite appalled at the anti-islamic comments going around here. We westerners pride ourselves in being tolerant and non-discriminating..yet somehow reading through all these comments I saw a recurring pattern of phrases such as "muslim psychopaths", "pedophile prophet", "terrorist moslems", ..etc. You all should be ashamed of yourselves. As should all of you who referred to westerners as evil colonists or whatever.
Seriously...GROW UP! And instead of tossing disgusting racial statements here and there..let's try and actually DISCUSS the matter like civilized people.
Peace out!