Don’t Mention the Constitution
From the desk of The Brussels Journal on Tue, 2007-01-30 07:08
It would be good if in countries where elections are due that the EU Constitution doesn’t become such a central topic where firm political positions are taken.
EU and Turkey
Submitted by Armor on Tue, 2007-01-30 16:13.
Kap.A said: "Again, a European Union that was purely an economic bloc (...) and a military alliance (...), and one that included Russia would be acceptable to me."
Turkey should be kept out precisely because we'd like the EU to be more than a trading bloc.
"3. [The Union in its current incarnation] seems determined to include Turkey and is allowing in an influx of non-European immigrants"
And "it" knows that most Europeans do not want Turkey inside the EU. So, it means that the EU has become an anti-European, anti-democratic structure. The people in charge of it do not share the ideals still prevalent 30 years ago. In its early days, the EU was something of a European nationalist ideal. Now it has turned into an empty box. The EU constitution project explicitly says it should be open to everybody irrespective of his race, creed, or sexual orientation. I think the EU project should be laid to rest for at least 50 years, until the immigration ideology dies down.
The Failings of Representative Democracy
Submitted by Kapitein Andre on Tue, 2007-01-30 08:23.
Is this yet another attempt to bypass another referendum or plebiscite on the European Union's constitution, so that it can be adopted by firmly elected politicians without the consultation or consent of their electorates?
Again, a European Union that was purely an economic bloc (i.e. a free trade area) and a military alliance (e.g. NATO or the defunct Warsaw Pact), and one that included Russia would be acceptable to me. The Union in its current incarnation is unacceptable because: