Duly Noted: Grasping into the Cookie-Jar

bj-logo-handlery.gif

George Handlery on the week that was. How to negotiate with pariahs? What makes Obama “formidable”? Good candidate, good President? Freedom and equality. Redistribution and oppression. The chance of success or the security of entitlements? The Party and reincarnation. Mugabe’s is an expert – on hunger.
 
1. Obama has caused some disquiet by his promise to talk to America’s enemies. The problem of the pledge is not his willingness to parley. Negotiations as such are not, ipso facto, a mistake. The nominee’s problem is that he appears to be willing to talk to Kim, Castro 2, the Mullahs. One also wonders whether Bin Laden is missing by accident or conscious design. When a party lacks legitimacy, unconditional talks give it something for nothing. Direct talks with the President instead of consultations behind the scenes with subordinates have a value. They represent a gain in stature for the opposing party and the price of that should be collected. There should also be an informal general agreement before the President sits down with a figure of the political underworld. Giving away the pre-conditions is unlikely to be a favor that is kindly returned. The direct negotiation upgrades the other side and that strengthens its hand. In addition, dealing with the pariahs of politics hands them a success and at the same time it puts the President under pressure to “succeed.” That means that he must reach an agreement, any agreement, anything that sounds good. Such a transaction makes it likely that the deal will be a bad one.
 
2. Considerations such as the foregoing are a valid reason to vote against a candidate. Regardless of that, if Obama loses, the charge will be racism. The bad thing about that is that such a misuse of the term devalues the matter and therefore blunts it as an instrument in cases in which the idea is properly applicable.
 
3. McCain called Obama (3 May) a “formidable opponent.” The term needs some qualification. His hither achievements – he lacks a record – do not make Obama formidable. Besting Clinton within the party is a genuine accomplishment. The successful grasp for power testifies to cleverness. At the same time, it tells little about what Obama can do with power. Add to this score his success while being a “deprived” young man at Harvard. The main reason for an impressive candidacy is that his bid gets support by two powerful and related prejudices. One is that campaigners against Obama must hold their punches to avoid the charge of racism. The other is that a segment of the electorate will automatically support Obama because of shared origins. Meanwhile, ignoring the record and his merits, many will try to prove something. By disregarding everything that would be unforgivable if Obama would be Average Joe, part of the electorate will try to prove that it is not racists. Whether such support is racist, thereby proving the opposite of what is intended is an open question.
 
4. Freedom is likely to contradict equality. Freedom is the right to be different and not to have to be a clone of the average.
 
5. A survey reported by Time (June 2) tells that 68% opined that wealth should be “more evenly” distributed than it is. This equals the wish that talent, acquired skills and drive also be evenly spread by a higher Power. Such as redistribution by government?
 
6. Taking it from the “rich” implies that everybody that was more than you do is rich. After the first phase of Robin Hoodism, two things will happen. One: you will be next. Two: those empowered to decide who gets what and, correspondingly, who loses how much, will miraculously wind up having “more”. (People who reallocate wealth have the power not to forget themselves.) Those who think that this imbalance will lead to a further round of corrections need to wake up. Experience tells that the personal beneficiaries of nominal social equality will have the might to proclaim justice as achieved and to discover the need for consolidation. The “Burmese Way to Socialism” and North Korea are good illustrations of how the “Outstanding Equals” apply the generalization in practice.
 
7. Political democracy is often attacked by those who want from freedom something else besides their basic liberty. Socialists tend to get critical of democracy when they discover that it is an unsuited political instrument to make economically everybody equally wealthy. The disappointment grows when it is realized that freedom amplifies relative inequality. Ergo, if they get access to power, they attempt to use the institutions they control to make everybody equal. Once this has happened, the bit about the limitation of democracy is confirmed. The results of leftist rule give support to an extension of the principle. It is that while democracy cannot make us richer than we are able to improve our lot, its processes can be effectively used to legislate all of us into poverty.
 
8. The real negative about a policy of handouts is not that the public’s money is diverted from projects where its use would be greater. More serious is another consequence. Institutionalized donations spread the delusion that there are free lunches. The worst about it is that it misdirects the talents of the recipients. From the creative striving to improve their lot, the so blessed are induced to turn into a more profitable direction. They learn that it is lucrative to find the tricks by which the public cow that grazes in the neighbor‘s garden can be milked.
 
9. A careless, therefore candid, sentence can reveal more than a data-laden study could. Take this case. The Wright/Obama church has received fifteen million from the Government, that is, since governments do not earn, from America’s tax payers. Fortunately for the recipient, God has ignored Wright’s call to “damn” America. Action by him would have seriously impaired the US’ ability to pay. The Church reacted to the contradiction implicit between the curse and the grasp into the cookie-jar. It revealed after the matter became public that, the money accepted was “necessary compensation for the legacy of white racism”. Two observations conclude the case. One: Only few church members could have been personally disadvantaged by the once prevalent and shameful “white racism”. Therefore, the money went to the beneficiaries of a quota system and of preferential employment and not to the victims of Jim Crow laws. Second: Those who ask for funds to compensate for someone else‘ past suffering, generally fail to face and prevail against the challenge extended by the opportunities their own time.
 
10. Either you make an advantage of your chances or you exploit the entitlements you are able to claim.
 
11. There are miracles – it is just so that they are rare and go unnoticed. For a recent one China’s CP is to be credited. Enter this under the category of “surprising miracles” because, even if this might be news to left-leaning clergy, the Communists are atheists. Now, this CP has discovered a new talent in its armory. Accordingly, the Party finds itself competent to determine reincarnations. With this, it emerges blessed with an understanding of the doings of the Buddhist version of the Holy Ghost. (The writer, who was taught in school “the Party never errs”, should have anticipated this.) Why this surprising assertion by such a claimant? Once the Dalai Lama (72) is gone, his successor will be a child chosen as the departed’s reincarnation. Until now, monks were in charge of this determination. Apparently, the government of Peking, armed with the “science” developed by Marx and Engels, has concluded that reincarnation is too important to remain monk-business. Finding, so to speak, the landing zone of the Spirit is a serious matter. As such, it is not to be entrusted to “clerical reactionaries” shrouded in strange colored bath towels.
 
12. Two items from a documentary on German TV about Muslims in Holland. An Islamist discovered the cause of the tension between natives who would like to be left alone and immigrants who want the indigenous to live their way. Surprise! The conflict was caused by no other than Bush. While you ponder that one, get ready for the second installment. The program also had an illuminating exchange to be shared.
“You insult Islam!”
“You call us whores!”
“Does that hurt you?”
 
13. Rome housed an UN-sponsored (FAO) gathering on world hunger. Among those, attending was Robert Mugabe. Some participants did not want him to be there. Wrong thinking. The man has a contribution to make. His expertise in the matter of misery is beyond doubt. His policies have reduced southern Africa’s bread-basket to a starvation zone.

@FFLegal

Aside from unverifiable claims about yourself, your comments contain no significant counter-argument. Although after having quoted and heaped praise on "300" ad nauseum, I'm not sure how you would extricate yourself.

 

In any event, you're listing someone else's credentials (can't fool the Kapitein), and your prose and prolificness indicates that you're far younger than you claim.

 

If your claims are true, you should know what Rule 303 is and where it is derived. Anyone with your extensive "formal education" who seriously uses "300" as ideological inspiration or for historical fact should be subject to it.

 

...so should people with Antisocial Personality Disorder, which isn't treatable anyway.

@onecent: Fin

Yet again you substitute insults such as "birdbrained" or "idiot" for fact or logic. Falsely assigning labels such as "socialist" does you no good either. You're a strong candidate for Antisocial Personality Disorder. Get help.

 

And your litmus test for governmental legitimacy is irrelevant in the face of Westphalia and Realpolitik. It deems illegitimate all of human and crucially Western civilisation, until relatively recently. Moreover, the political philosophy remains dominated by luminaries that were products of 'illegitimate' states according to your definition.

 

Your claims are easily refuted by statistics on Iraqi refugee flows to Western Europe before and after the US began military operations there.

 

'Nuff said re: your bullsh*t. Having said that, whatever slides of out of a bull is immensely more intelligent than anything you might have to say. I'm going to have to regard you as Bush does Chavez: I have nothing more to say to you.

@Kapitein Andre

@Kapitein Andre

Kapitein Andre stated to another poster: "You're a strong candidate for Antisocial Personality Disorder. Get help."

You are just a fountain of knowledge! Now you're a self anointed "psychiatrist" handing out a diagnosis! (rolling eyes).

As to what has been posted, I think the posts speak for themselves, so I'll say nothing more on that issue, let the reader be the judge, and only note that there is nothing to "extricate" myself from.

I write in a "down to earth" manner. Such "down to earth" writing style, in my humble opinion, provides for better overall communication.

I'm not trying to make myself sound old or young. I do not care and/or desire to sound like an "elitist snob" or a "wanna-be elitist snob". I just am what I am, i.e. 48 years old with the education I previously stated. What you believe or don't believe is of little concern and/or of no importance to me.

Rule 303? I must of skipped class the day said rule was taught for I have no clue what said rule is, unless you are referring to the Lee Enfield .303 rifle, used by an Englishman Harry "Breaker" Morant, who living in Australia, enlisted in the Australian military, to help the British fight in the Boer's war in South Africa where he stated, when questioned, that he shot the prisoners under "Rule 303", meaning he had the Lee Enfield .303 issued to him and in hand and that was all the authority he needed. (Why am I telling you this, you took history and you know everything! LOL ) If not, then it is not a Rule in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, and/or in our state rules of procedure. Perhaps your referencing a GAAP rule, but I've not practiced accounting or even looked at the accounting rules since I graduated from college in 1982. I got the degree and never used it for I worked for part of the year after graduation in the coal mines of West Virginia and then at the front desk of a Marriott, before entering law school in the fall of 1983. In fact, I need Quicken and/or Quickbooks to balance my checkbook! LOL!

By the way, I'm one proud unapologetic "anti-social" SOB and I don't need a "wanna-be" shrink to tell me that! ROFLMAO!!!!!

Finally, have you seen the movie "300"? Damn good movie!!! :)

PS - Just for fun I pieced together a comic book cover just for you Kapitein Marvel found at: http://i202.photobucket.com/albums/aa194/FLLegal/Silly/Kapiteinmarvel3.jpg

@onecent

If a catalyst exacerbates a process, in this case Muslim migratory flows, it does not create it.

Your analytical skills are as poor as your communication ones. Like many before you, your insults only serve to exacerbate this fact.

I suggest you reserve your comments for posters such as FLLegal, who would rather derive their historical knowledge from 300 than a book.

Who needs a book when you got Kapitein Andre!

Kapitein Andre stated "I suggest you reserve your comments for posters such as FLLegal, who would rather derive their historical knowledge from 300 than a book."

I noticed you ignored what I said and just atttacked me. Typical.

I did not major in history in college, but accounting four years and then law for three years getting degrees in both. However, it is still painfully obvious that you have a warped and distored view of history. My study of history and research goes well beyond "300" and well beyond my formal education. I have had 30 plus years of paying extremely close attention to current events, foreign affairs, and political/economic discourse and theory. I am discerning and learned enough to know that when it comes to history that you, Kapitein Andre, are simply a "legend in your own mind".

@onecent

Again excellent comments.

@Kapitein

"If a catalyst exacerbates a process, in this case Muslim migratory flows, it does not create it.

Just what part of the immigration of Muslims to Europe was entrenched and in big numbers long before the Iraq war are you not getting? Turks, Morrocans, Algerians, Pakistanis, NOT Iraqis, can you process that?

The Iraq war had nothing to do with Muslim immigration to Europe. And, it will have nothing to do with the EU admitting Turkey eventually. Europeans have no one to blame but themselves.

@Onecent: Frederic Bastiat "The Law" Great book free on internet

Onecent: There is a French economist by the name of Frederic Bastiat who lived from 1801-1850. One of his books (pamphlet) he wrote was called "The Law". It is an excellent read in my opinion. If you have not read it, it can be found on the internet everywhere, including this link:

http://www.constitution.org/law/bastiat.htm

The preface states:

"The Law, first published as a pamphlet in June, 1850, is already more than a hundred years old. And because its truths are eternal, it will still be read when another century has passed."

Socialism has preverted the very purpose of the law.

An excerpt from said book:

THE LAW BY FREDERIC BASTIAT

The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law become the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!

If this is true, it is a serious fact, and moral duty requires me to call the attention of my fellow-citizens to it.

Life Is a Gift from God

We hold from God the gift which includes all others. This gift is life -- physical, intellectual, and moral life.

But life cannot maintain itself alone. The Creator of life has entrusted us with the responsibility of preserving, developing, and perfecting it. In order that we may accomplish this, He has provided us with a collection of marvelous faculties. And He has put us in the midst of a variety of natural resources. By the application of our faculties to these natural resources we convert them into products, and use them. This process is necessary in order that life may run its appointed course.

Life, faculties, production--in other words, individuality, liberty, property -- this is man. And in spite of the cunning of artful political leaders, these three gifts from God precede all human legislation, and are superior to it.

Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.

What Is Law?

What, then, is law? It is the collective organization of the individual right to lawful defense.

Each of us has a natural right--from God--to defend his person, his liberty, and his property. These are the three basic requirements of life, and the preservation of any one of them is completely dependent upon the preservation of the other two. For what are our faculties but the extension of our individuality? And what is property but an extension of our faculties?

If every person has the right to defend -- even by force -- his person, his liberty, and his property, then it follows that a group of men have the right to organize and support a common force to protect these rights constantly. Thus the principle of collective right -- its reason for existing, its lawfulness -- is based on individual right. And the common force that protects this collective right cannot logically have any other purpose or any other mission than that for which it acts as a substitute. Thus, since an individual cannot lawfully use force against the person, liberty, or property of another individual, then the common force -- for the same reason -- cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, liberty, or property of individuals or groups.

Such a perversion of force would be, in both cases, contrary to our premise. Force has been given to us to defend our own individual rights. Who will dare to say that force has been given to us to destroy the equal rights of our brothers? Since no individual acting separately can lawfully use force to destroy the rights of others, does it not logically follow that the same principle also applies to the common force that is nothing more than the organized combination of the individual forces?

If this is true, then nothing can be more evident than this: The law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense. It is the substitution of a common force for individual forces. And this common force is to do only what the individual forces have a natural and lawful right to do: to protect persons, liberties, and properties; to maintain the right of each, and to cause justice to reign over us all.

-End of excerpt

Check it out onecent I think you'll enjoy it.

@Kapitein Andre

Get real, Europe's Muslim immiragtion problems long preceded America's invasion of Iraq. The Muslim immigrants in Europe aren't Iraqi refugees that have been coming for decades. Take a look around. They are Turks, Moroccans, Algerians, Pakistanis, you fool

 

The Bush policies didn't do a damn thing but expose the insincerity of Europe in confronting Islam's terror war and what quislings that Europeans truly are. Oh, and, Putin was given every ridiculous benefit of the doubt by Bush,  your ignorance is appalling. Russia's drift is what comes natural to them, threatening Europe and triangulating.  Again, you are so totally clueless.

 

 

 

Amen onecent

Amen onecent. The Muslim invasion did long precede Iraq. The war declared by Islam against us was long before Iraq.

Kapitein Andre revealed much of himself with this comment:

"And socialism was no more corrupt than laissez-faire capitalism".

He takes the economic system laissez-faire capitalism, which has done the most for mankind and places it at the "corrupt" end of the scale. Then he says socialism, which is in my opinion the most corrupt and evil of systems, and says it is no more corrupt than capitalism. You can see which system he favors. His words reveal his "thinking".

And this statement by the Kaptein: "Like it or not, the North Korean, Cuban and Iranian governments are the recognised and legitimate (in the Westphalian sense) representatives of their respective states."

Nothing legitmate about said governments in my opinion albeit said evil tyrannical murderous governments are "recognized".

And this statement by Kapitein: "...freedom and equality are contradictory and must be balanced."

Now that is nonsense. You can have freedom and equality, i.e. equality of opportunity. But I suspect the Kapitein is defining "equality" based on the socialist and/or Marxist ideal which in an anathema to freedom. Socialism and freedom are indeed contradictory and between the two I lean towards freedom.

@FLLegal

It's never occured to a birdbrained socialist like Kapitein that the "North Korean, Cuban and Iranian governments" are hardly "legitimate" as free and fair elections with a viable opposition party allowed aren't the foundation of those governments. No small consideration. Only a numbskull would assign legitimacy to those three totalitarian states. I propose that most of their own citizens wouldn't. The US won't for those reasons, but, a socialist like Kapitein will. Spot the idiot.

Kapitein is the typically underdeveloped mind that spouts undigested nonsense. And, trust me, you'll find more in the socialist camp than among conservative capitalists.

And, "...freedom and equality are contradictory and must be balanced"...is idiotic beyond belief. If Kapitein represents the attitudes of the majority of Europeans, it's no wonder that the Islamists are going to have an easy time eating them alive.

@onecent

I. Europe borders the Middle East and is the greatest beneficiary of refugee flows caused by upheaval there, be it the result of revolution in Iran, or American military operations in Iraq.

 

II. Not unlike Europe, Russia is surrounded by Muslim countries and hosts a growing Muslim population, while its own is in decline. Although Russia is not in the business of appeasing or succumbing to Islam, it cannot abide the United States antagonising Muslim neighbors such as Iran nor instigating ill-conceived "color revolutions" throughout the post-Soviet space.

 

III. The United States has no international goodwill remaining to cherry-pick which states and leaders are "good" and which are "evil". Instead of quaranteening China, Washington successfully took advantage of the Sino-Soviet rift. Instead of quaranteening the Soviet Union - a "most dangerous creep" - Washington engaged Moscow and was ultimately well-placed to "manage" the USSR's collapse. I'm not claiming that warfare is unnecessary and all disputes can be resolved civilly. However, situations change and communication lines should always be open, including top-level ones. Indeed, it took decades before McNamara realized that Hanoi was not a pawn of Beijing or Moscow and that the war was about independence not ideology. Some sixty thousand fatalities later, it appears that there was something to say.

 

IV. While Cuba can be ignored without worry. Venezuela is a key energy producer and figures largely in Latin American politics. And Iran is a contender for leading the Middle East and is the bastion of Shi'itism.

@Kapitein Andre

Well Kapitein, it's maybe because the Usual Suspects you name deserve to be pariahs.

 

And, as far as "exacerbated tensions" with socialist anti-American Europe, tough.  And, how did that happen, because the US unseated two smarmy ME thug states or refuses to sign the wealth transfer required of the Global Warming scam or are the only Good Cop left standing with, God forbid, an actual military?

 

We've had nothing to say to Castro for 5 decades and that has worked out just fine as a policy. We have nothing to say to Chavez either.  Sometimes  quaranteeing the world's most dangerous creeps makes good sense, something that the EU hasn't the spine to do.

@George Handlery RE: Duly Noted

I. Like it or not, the North Korean, Cuban and Iranian governments are the recognised and legitimate (in the Westphalian sense) representatives of their respective states. And at present there are no other parties inside or out of these states better suited to direct and unconditional negotiation.

 

II. Indeed, freedom and equality are contradictory and must be balanced. Even more confusing are the aims of the République française, as fraternité counters the freedom to be separate.

 

III. One does not necessarily require talent, skills and drive to be acquired. Indeed, many with these attributes are not wealthy.

 

IV. One cannot ignore the impact of socio-economic disparity on politics. And socialism was no more corrupt than laissez-faire capitalism.

 

V. The Bush administration's foreign policy has exacerbated tensions in Western Europe as well as for Russian national security.

 

VI. When sound policies outweigh victory over the White race, Mugabe and the ZANU-PF will be no more...

No fear

Have no fear.. the racist Marxist Obama will not win the election.