Dutch queen and all of those royal families of Europe who agreed to play a role of well paid clowns in democratic circus are NOT monarchists. They are democrats and openly admit to be democrats! In current conditions all of those people who refuse to declare their support for re-establishment of real monarchy should surrender their titles. They don't deserve such honor. We are living in difficult times and thus I'm not very committed to legitimism. Those legitimate rulers whom reject monarchy as a political system should be stripped of their rights to crown.

onecent: That link is profoundly disturbing. I am trying to imagine how Prince Charles would look with a zabiba , similar to the one on the forehead of Ayman al-Zawahiri.

Words fail me.

This is not something that conservatives should raise in defence. This document was produced by socialist international and very often goes clearly against basic conservative principles. If you raise DoHR, it look like you accept everything. Unless you would clearly write that the left is unable to stick to its own principles collected in this document.

Monarchist: We tried monarchy for 150 years. It didn't work. We then devised a constitutional system intended to preserve the strengths, and mitigate the weaknesses, of monarchical government. I would agree that excesses in the democratic direction have subverted our well-wrought constitutional system. But so have they subverted the well-wrought constitutional monarchy of Britain. I do not see monarchy as in any way a solution to our ills. We require rather a spiritual and cultural renaissance that will overcome our liberal political prejudices, along with our other spiritual and intellectual errors. Sursum corda!

Cogito: Please give the reasons for your tactical advice to obey, for now, the sharia-based strictures against insulting the so-called Prophet. Given the Islamic propagandists' efforts to exploit Western institutions in their efforts to exert control and power in the West, the opposite to what you advise seems called for: a massive campaign of truth-telling, so widespread that the neo-Nazis of the leftist-Moslem alliance will not be able to quell it. It is probably not the truth, and not provable, that Mohammed was a child molester in the context of his era, though freedom of speech requires a wide berth in the discussion of important political issues. The essential truth, that everyone should speak, is that Moslems are commanded to be our enemies by their most deeply held beliefs, and that their presence in the West in any but the tiniest numbers is incompatible with the safety and prosperity and continuing identity of Western peoples. In very small numbers, Moslems can peacefully thrive in the West because they are under no compulsion to subvert and dominate Western societies. But when a very slight critical mass is reached, they are helpless against the religious command to hate, deceive, exterminate, dominate, and exploit the infidel. The great truth that everyone must speak, now, is that permitting substantial Moslem immigration to the West, with the result that any community has more than a tiny Moslem minority, was a terrible mistake which must be reversed as quickly as possible. The steps to be taken are: 1) end all Moslem immigration; 2) encourage Moslem outmigration by a) offering cash payments and purchase of real property to those who depart; and b) outlawing Moslem organizations, assemblies, and activism of any type as subversive conspiracies. Western countries used to know how to protect themselves from serious threats. These measures are entirely consistent with such traditional knowledge.

See Don Cheadle's Traitor for a powerful demonstration of the above. And viva Geert Wilders!