I think I'd have to agree with Fjordman on this one.  Islam is not just another religion comparable to Christianity.  Secularism is embedded in the latter, while Sayyid Qutb, intellectual godfather of the Muslim Brotherhood, called it Christianity's "great schizophrenia," this term obviously carrying a negative connotation.  The very Western values we still cherish today (albeit it less and less, thanks to the cultural revolution of the 1960s) are mostly rooted in our religious traditions.  To assume that Islam will follow us into achieving prosperous liberal democratic societies is to deny both its illiberal character and history's general unpredictability.

I have a hard time understanding the calls for an Islamic reformation.  Do we mean a "Reformation" (notice the capital R) in the Christian sense of the word?  For the Reformation in the West in fact entailed a return to scripture, which is nothing other than the literal meaning of the word "fundamentalism," and is already taking place within Islam.  The importance of the Christian Reformation was its challenge to Rome's absolute authority over religious matters.  Together with the schism of Orthodox and Roman Christianity, and the establishment of the Anglican Church independent of Rome, the Reformation set an important precedent for the history of the West: the authority of a single religion under an absolute worldly ruler -- by itself illegitimate, according to the Scripture -- will never remain unchallenged.  This, of course, had implications far beyond religion, which is why the Westphalian Peace is still regarded as a landmark in international politics.

The remaining option, then, would be an Islamic "reformation" without the capital R, meaning something like a revolutionary move of the Muslim world toward individualism, liberalism, secularism, and democracy.  This would, in fact, be more of an Islamic Enlightenment.  In short, we are asking of Islam to reform itself into something for which it has neither the foundations nor a natural longing.  Only Islam can reform itself, and since it is, I think, not a coincidence that the world's free societies are concentrated in the West and authoritarian regimes rule the world of Islam, it still has a long way to go.

These regimes reflect Islamic culture, not the other way around.  Overthrowing them won't bring any more freedom or democracy, just another despotic dictator.  As Dutch "populist" right-wing politician Geert Wilders recently stated, Muslims have to strip the Qur'an of half its pages.  I wouldn't bet my money on that happening.  And even if it will, a liberal democratic Islamic world is not necessarily going to be the natural outcome.

The Holocaust is shamelessly exploited as an excuse for creating an artificial superstate and above all for imposing restrictions on free speech for everybody who wants to oppose this project.

Can Fjordman name the Jewish organizations campaigning against this shameless exploitation of the Holocaust and demanding an end to the restrictions on free speech in Europe? Nope. The UK doesn't yet have laws against Holocaust denial. It does, however, have draconian laws against "incitement to racial hatred", which were introduced and have been steadily strengthened at the behest of the Jewish Board of Deputies and the Jewish Community Security Trust. Fjordman knows that Jewish organizations are the world's most powerful enemies of free speech, which is why he's scared to direct a word of criticism towards Jews for their central role in the destruction of the West.

Fjordman:

Islam isn’t reformable.

Of course it is. It just needs some sustained tough love: the overthrow of intolerant regimes that are encouraging jihadism and the annulling of the Islamic world's oil domination. The Islamic regimes that refuse to reform can be replaced by those that will.

This just needs the right leadership in the West. That's what's been lacking so far. 

LGF's, while worth a quick glance as an Islamofascist news aggregator, was never a site of much substance beyond that. Since its inception, Johnson has cultivated mind numbing sycophants ("the lizards" as he has designated them, heck he often tucks them in at night with musical clips, grow up!) with the same echo chamber infantilism as Daily Kos at the other end of the spectrum. The positive side to his accusations, and on his part protracted behind his wall, is that he has driven thinking folks to examine his accusations which in my opinion isn't serving him well.

Europeans are in so much more serious danger than we are. They are trying against political forces not aligned in their favor in arresting the encroachment of Eurabia. Considering how nascent their newly forming resistance movement is, one has to give some benefit of the doubt that the good guys in Europe will purge themselves of undesirables.

Thanks to the Brussels Journal and Gates of Vienna, the complexity of this can be examined and debated on comment threads that are transparent and not subject to banning because you aren't spewing the site owners viewpoint.