Taurus689: According to the Uniform Crime statistics ( I'm posting this for other readers because I have no doubt that you already know this.) there are an average 10,000 reported rapes of White women by men "of color" annually while the number of black women who are assaulted by White men is negligible.

 

Please provide a hyperlinked source to support this claim, because this would mean that 9-11% of all rapes in the United States are perpetrated by non-White males against White females, which is significant to say the least.

 

I must remind you, however, that each and every female African slave was raped and usually impregnated by her White American owner. Indeed, Black Americans, save for African immigrants, all have from 10%-33.3% or more White ancestry as a result.

"These acts are directly related to race and are not isolated or random acts. To the conqueror goes the spoils, and women, along with wealth and land have been part of these since time immemorial. All I can respond with is that any White woman who associates with non-White men takes her life into her own hands."

True. But today avoidance is no guarantee of safety as in the case of the Wichita Massacre, the Knoxville case and too many others to count. According to the Uniform Crime statistics ( I'm posting this for other readers because I have no doubt that you already know this.) there are an average 10,000 reported rapes of White women by men "of color" annually while the number of black women who are assaulted by White men is negligible. 

 

Taurus689: Black families are not lining up to adopt these kids however they are the first to protest these inter-racial adoptions; claiming that the children will not grow up to appreciate their culture,the very "Culture" that brought them into this world and made them unadoptable.

 

Clearly Black Americans would rather march to folly than admit responsibility or White cultural superiority.

Taurus689: There was the case of the woman in Wissconsin, Minnesota or one of those northern states who took in a couple of NOLA evacuees and was later murdered by them...Some colleges and universities require students to do community service projects as part of their graduation credits. I read of a case where one coed was assigned to an inner city area to teach kids to read. She was rewarded by being taken up to a rooftop, gang raped and then thrown from the roof.

 

These acts are directly related to race and are not isolated or random acts. To the conqueror goes the spoils, and women, along with wealth and land have been part of these since time immemorial. All I can respond with is that any White woman who associates with non-White men takes her life into her own hands.

 

@Armor: full agreement there.

 

@Quijybo: watching too many special programmes on Catholic sex-abuse scandals I see...

 

@Nebuer: great post!

 

atheling: Indeed, the problem in the Church is that because of political correctness, homosexual men have been welcomed into the priesthood, and now our children are paying for our stupid and false ideologies.

 

I am certain the 'bad' men have been inducted into the Catholic priesthood for centuries. Secondly, I do not believe homosexuals are anymore prone to sexual criminal acts or pedophelia (please do not mention sodomy!) than heterosexuals. There is no "problem" in the Church, declining attendance notwithstanding; the "problem" is the mass media seizing upon every scandal and convincing the public consciousness that Catholic priests are all homosexual pedophiles.

The Catholic Church has a special, disastrous problem with pedophilia.

From wikipedia, the incidence of priest pedophile accusations in the US to date:

The John Jay Report, commissioned by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, found accusations against 4,392 priests in the USA, equalling about 4% of all U.S. priests. Figures supplied by the Catholic League, and the U. S. Department of Education theorize that the abuse figures in the Catholic Church are similar to abuse in other institutions such as education.

The key word is "accusations". And, the other, not to be ignored, comparison is to the incidence with teachers.

I don't know the stats globally, I'm guessing that they are in line with the US.

Pedophilia is hardly the reason for the collapse of Christianity in Europe.  Socialism is no friend of religion.

I'd like to mention another option: adoption. There are literally millions of children across the globe who will never have a chance at normal family life. In his book America Alone, Mark Steyn points out the most important aspect of cultural cohesion is values, not race. Children from China, Ethiopia, Vietnam, Russia, Haiti, etc. are all capable of learning to cherish such "Western" values as freedom and self-determination -- if they are raised by loving parents who hold those values dear.

Take note, those who would excuse their desire for perpetual adolescene by insisting the earth cannot sustain further population growth. (Such as these people: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/femail/article.html?in_article_id=...) Adoption adds no more people to the currently existing total. It only increases the odds that those with the bleakest futures may become productive, contributing members of society.

Imagine if 10% of the families of the West opened their hearts and homes to the neediest, most vulnerable people on the planet.

Hippocrates believed that abortion was wrong, how true! Today the Law allows abortions, but that does not make it right! Slavery was also legal. We sneer at Nazis because of their cruelty and  murders. How about us? Since abortion was made legal in Western Europe, there have been over 40 million abortions: http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/index.html. We can't afford all these children, they would cramp my lifestyle... was the cry. Now we have had to import workers from overseas, mostly Muslims, who's descendants are mostly on welfare and who are really cramping our lifestyle! We did not want to raise our own children, now we are forced to raise the children of others! Abortion is the killing of unborn children and it should be outlawed! People who don't want children can use contraceptives. We don't and we can't legally kick out tenants from their premises at whimm, but we can mince babies out of their wombs on a moment's notice and legally!  The unborn cry out for justice !

 
Taurus689: Why do we need them to intermarry with our own? If we begin reproducing in sizeable numbers and in homes where there are two parents, a mother and a functional father who is actually married to the mother, we may be back to where we were before all this madness began.Let's leave the Third World immigrants out of the equation. Anyone who wishes to intermarry with them should represent the exception rather than the rule. Of course De gustibus non disputandum est but the West doesn't need to look like the colors of Benneton. Many a good stew has been rendered unrecognizable by overspicing it.

 

Agreed.

 

Taurus689: If we like to see exotic people and customs, we have Travelocity for that purpose and they can do the same but we need not import them. To paraphrase B. Franklin, Fish and company begin to smell after a few days.

 

Interesting and funny. However, what happens when tourism results in miscegenation? To whom does the child belong?

 

dchamil: If the Catholics want us to have more children, they can practise what they preach by permitting priests and nuns to marry and have children.

 

I hardly think that this would statistically impact fertility rates. Furthermore, their preaching seems to keep bedsprings squeaking and maternity wards (or corrugated tin hovels) filled throughout Latin America.

Zmirak: Any healthy creature or culture shows two signs of life: It reproduces itself, and it fights off intruders.

 

Full agreement.

 

Zmirak: The backbreaking jobs we are currently pressing upon middle-aged foreigners would be taken up soon by teenagers – our own and our neighbors’ children.

 

Not by middle or upper class youths. We would have to rebuild and expand the old lower class base to accomplish this or alter fundamental cultural values relating to socio-economic status and individual self-actualizaiton. Nor am I certain that Western societies can begin denying education and socio-economic opportunities without touching off upheaval and revolution.

 

Other options include greater automation and more extensive use of robotics, and suffering economically in order to preserve ethnic enclaves.

 

Zmirak: The immigrants among us would see a vigorous, vital culture – and wish to assimilate. Deprived of constant influxes from the Old Country, their offspring would intermarry with our own, and a little spice to our current stew – instead of filling up our emptying country like a vessel.

 

One would assume that the "vigorous, vital culture" is for us, not for immigrants. Moreover, I would imagine that those opposed to immigration are not eager to see such intermarriage nor add "a little spice".

 

Zmirak: Since I love old Europe too, I hope that this generation can rouse itself to reject the invasion of an intolerant, alien faith – a truncated heresy of Christianity best suited to desert nomads...

 

If this generation does "rouse itself", the European traditions that it will have to exemplify will be more appropriate for 1635, 1916 or 1942.

 

Zmirak: ...and deed its children a chance of rediscovering their heritage.

 

I do not see a rediscovery of their religious heritage; rather their racial and ethnic ones.

 

Zmirak: Better Notre Dame remain unused for a few decades in an underpopulated Paris than be turned, like Hagia Sophia, into a mosque.

 

Agreed.

 

Zmirak: We owe too much to Europe to slough it off like the shell of a hermit crab. The continent which gave us Charlemagne and Shakespeare, de Tocqueville and Vincent de Paul, deserves a second chance. Out of this filial piety to the cradle of our culture, I pray that the Turks once again will be turned back at its gates.

 

This relegates affinity for Europe to specific 'European' values and ideas, rather than to the European peoples themselves. Offspring must acknowledge their parents no matter if they are 'good' or 'bad'.

If the Catholics want us to have more children, they can practise what they preach by permitting priests and nuns to marry and have children.

"The backbreaking jobs we are currently pressing upon middle-aged foreigners would be taken up soon by teenagers – our own and our neighbors’ children. The immigrants among us would see a vigorous, vital culture – and wish to assimilate. Deprived of constant influxes from the Old Country, their offspring would intermarry with our own, and a little spice to our current stew – instead of filling up our emptying country like a vessel."

 

Why do we need them to intermarry with our own? If we begin reproducing in sizeable numbers and in homes where there are two parents, a mother and a functional father who is actually married to the mother, we may be back to where we were before all this madness began.Let's leave the Third World immigrants out of the equation. Anyone who wishes to intermarry with them should represent the exception rather than the rule. Of course De gustibus non disputandum est but the West doesn't need to look like the colors of Benneton. Many a good stew has been rendered unrecognizable by overspicing it.

If we like to see exotic people and customs, we have Travelocity for that purpose and they can do the same but we need not import them. To paraphrase B. Franklin, Fish and company begin to smell after a few days.