Sarkozy: “Islamization is Inevitable”

There is nothing new here. We knew what Sarkozy's vision of the future was: an "Islam of France", "métissage" between races and ethnic groups, dissolution of nationalist, regional, and ethnic identities, subjugation to Brussels, openness to socialism, and a Turkey as closely aligned with Europe as possible, etc...

But it's always sobering to hear it again, from one who knows Sarkozy personally. Philippe de Villiers was interviewed by the weekly Famille Chrétienne. The Catholic blog Le Salon Beige relates part of the interview:

- Why are you so focused on the theme of Turkey and Islamization?

- Quite simply because we will see the first transformations of churches into mosques in the coming three years. At any rate, that is what Nicolas Sarkozy told me.

- When?

- I had an in depth discussion with him at Elysée at the end of last year. He said to me: "You have intuition, I have the figures. And your intuition is confirmed by my figures. The Islamization of Europe is inevitable." Careful: it's a process that will not occur overnight, but will take decades.

- Why does this issue appear to be of central importance to you?

- Most politicians have a comforting ignorance of what Islam is and propose transforming Europe into a supermarket of competing religions. Unaware that Islam is not only a religion since, by melding the temporal and the spiritual, it imposes a law. But behind this comforting ignorance of politicians, there are those who know. (...) The reality is that we are headed for a criss-cross [chassé-croisé] with, on one side, Europe and its en masse abortions, its promotion of gay marriage, and on the other, immigration en masse (...)

"Chassé-croisé" is virtually impossible to translate. Originally a choreographic term, it usually refers to a crowded movement in one direction that passes but never encounters a crowded movement in another direction. Sometimes it is just kept as is in English.

- Aren't you exaggerating the dimensions of the phenomenon?

- No. The crux of the issue is simple: Europe is refusing its own demographic future. And it is working with a fearsome weapon towards this end, written into the Charter of fundamental rights appended to the treaty of Lisbon: the promotion of gay marriage. This in turn is accomplished through the principle of non-discrimination and the disassociation of marriage from the sex of the spouses (which appears in article 7 of the Charter of fundamental rights). In reality, there are two weapons being used by European leaders to kill Europe demographically: the promotion of gay marriage and en masse abortions. And a third: the recourse to immigration that is 80% Islamic in order to replace the people who are no longer there (...)

As usual there are LSB readers who question Villiers' sincerity and motives. But this time, there are also many who applaud his courage. He is certainly putting more muscle into his words on the eve of the election.
A spokesman for Elysée protested saying: "Philippe de Villiers is not the spokesman for Elysée. He makes multiple declarations on this topic, declarations that obviously need to be regarded with caution."

The anti-west agenda

As I've already said in this blog, promoting Islam is part of the "worldist" agenda, intended to destroy Western civilization : his culture, his morality, his ethnicity and his economy (do you understand now why all industry has gone to China ?).
The truth is that our politicians simply want to destroy us. It seems unbelievable, but if you see the consequences you'll have to admit it.
So the matter is not Islam itself, but the ideology of western elites.


Since most western political leaders will believe in whatever it takes (anything), the transformation to Islam by Sarkozy should be accomplished with relative ease. However, by believing in anything it should be interesting to watch as they are required to believe in something. It is their zeal, not their belief that may get them through the transformation. What they all lack in substance, they make up for in activity or zeal.

Pale rider is correct, for without civilizational decadence brought about in part by multi-cultural nonsense, there would be little interest in Islam in the West. However, demography is only numbers. Competence and belief can defeat demography, because the few have always done it all--in everything. The question is: will they?


Ultimately everything is about demographics. What most right-wing nationalist and conservative parties in Western Europe simply refuse to admit or realize is that Western moral relativism and decadence are as much a problem as radical Islam. In fact, our postmodern and hedonistic pseudo-culture with its feminist 'Golden calf' (or cow, rather) is the very reason why the West in on the decline. Of course it would cost some of them a lot of votes to make staunchly anti-feminist, anti-homosexual statements and suggest that their own people are also at fault, because most people now more than ever staunchly support these idols in the face of a religion that is situated at the other extreme end as the very antithesis of Western immorality, albeit equally abominable and perverted in my opinion. P2V is about the only conservative politician in Western Europe that I know of who dares to challenge modern-day Western ethics and appears to be identifying the lack of Christian family values as a considerable part, if not the cause, of the problems we face today.

Vive PDV!

RW: I hope enough people think as you do to make a statement today. In times like these, however, the ballot box must be regarded as only one means by which to save the nation. Demonstrations, publicity, lawsuits, civil disobedience, "committees of correspondence," and "self-help" are also available. God bless France!

de Villiers

Demographics again.
When is some practical solution to the problem going to be offered?
How about this idea...
Only women with children are contributing to the future of society.
Perhaps feminism should be pursued to its logical conclusion.
Voting should be limited to mothers only.

De Villiers is right as usual

As Enoch Powell did back in the 1960s, De Villiers turns out incredibly gutsy to set forth such facts, for demographics do not lie. They are but a foreboding of what is likely to happen, likely does not mean unavoidable, for the future is always moving, and is not frozen. Many are those who mock Mr. De Villiers as little short of a scarecrow, most notable ethnic French, yet he--amidst most politicians--was one of the only ones to dare speak out in favour of the true character of France. As a staunch patriot, such a fate seems impossible to accept for him, and he will commit himself to combatting the liberal establishment that aims at erasing the European civilization into a "multiculturalist", tasteless, international crucible that will include all civilizations except the West that is to be chastened for his purported crimes. I will regret not to be able to cast my ballot for Mr. De Villiers tomorrow, for he was too misguided to see his hunter friends (CPNT) are causing him to plummet in polls due to their socialistic ideals. Libertas should not have included CPNT, but only Mr. De Villiers' party "Mouvement Pour la France". Too bad. None the less, I am convinced I will vote for him in the next presidential election.