Immigration in France: Counting on the Enemy

In his previous posts, the French economist Gérard Pince demonstrated through his own calculations, which were in turn based on a handful of givens furnished by leading research institutes, that the official figures on immigration are not only too low, but deliberately skewed so as to fool the general population. According to Pince, by the year 2060 (50 years from now, but in fact much sooner than that, since for certain age groups, the tipping point is about to be reached), the ethnic French people will be a minority in their own land. Furthermore, he demonstrates that the number of North and sub-Saharan Africans and Asians in France today is at least 9 million. (The figure bandied about by many news sources is still 5 million, based on data from the Interior Ministry from several years ago. But time has passed, and inevitably the numbers have doubled).

Pince sees only one possible "solution". I put the word in quotes, because it is not the solution we would have wanted, nor is it the only possible one, but given the probability that there will be no change in government policy, no matter which party is in power (and there really is only one party at this point), it becomes, by default, the only thing one can hope for. In a word, he is counting on the enemy to overplay its hand:

To defuse the bomb of ethnic invasion, we cannot count on our compatriots. However, hope comes from our adversaries. Let me explain this paradox. The French people who are conscious of the peril haven't the slightest chance of convincing the majority, conditioned by propaganda from childhood. We can expect nothing from public opinion or from elections that direct the life of a democracy. On the other side, the Islamic powers have the same demographic projections as we do. Ever since Boumedienne and Qadhafi, not a day goes by that some mullah doesn't announce the Islamization of Europe before the end of the century. For the ripened fruit to fall on its own, it is nonetheless imperative to avoid excessively visible demonstrations that run the risk of waking up our countrymen. Now, it happens that a part of the youth of the Third World is exhibiting more and more impatience. At the opposite pole of our bleeding heart liberalism, this youth dreams of fighting it out as quickly as possible, and the smallest spark could, therefore, ignite a general conflagration.

Boumedienne, former president of Algeria and Moammar Qadhafi have both predicted the takeover of Europe by Islam.

In this way the adversary becomes an ally. In truth, general and long-lasting riots would modify the behavior of our countrymen. In a former life, I used to go to Gabon where I visited a couple of leftist expats. One day in 1964, the president of the country was overthrown and right away the populace spilled out into the streets shouting "Dirty whites! We're going to bust your heads!" You can imagine my surprise when I discovered my left-wing friend on her knees praying "My God, send the parachutists as quickly as possible!" This comical volte-face means that fear can disconnect even the most conditioned opinions. People recover their normal behavior patterns, as if a spell were suddenly lifted. In the event of major disturbances, the majority of Frenchmen would demand the intervention of the armed forces, the application of martial law and the installing of a provisional dictatorship under Article 16.

The word "paras" refers to military parachutists, an elite regiment of the French army, who would end the insurrection. Article 16 of the French Constitution grants exceptional powers to the president in a time of national crisis.

My belief is that things have to get REALLY BAD before people exhibit the type of disenchantment Pince refers to, but it could happen that way.

You might object that events such as these do not necessarily imply a reversal of massive migrations. First, let me say that wars have the advantage of bringing solutions to problems that are unsolvable in time of peace. Among some of these solutions are, notably, the numerous examples from the last century of population relocation. We can cite, for example, the departure in 1948 of 500,000 Palestinians from the territory that is today Israel. As the Israeli troops advanced, the Palestinians had to flee their quarters and their cities and eventually relocate in refugee camps. In the same way, after a general insurrection, the re-conquest of territory by our armed forces would inevitably provoke an exodus by the insurgent population and their relocation to camps in the border regions, which could come under UN control. To those who constantly warn us about concentration camps, all we have to do is remind them of Israeli policies: policies that have never aroused the indignation of our intellectuals who frequent the cafés of Saint-Germain-des-Près!
So there does exist a slender hope, but it doesn't depend on us. For the time being, let us fight to ban the burka, to stigmatize the head scarf and to dissolve salafist sects. This road map should be enough to rally all those interested in resisting.

Do we need another 9/11? Does France need more riots, devastation, murders, muggings, rapes and arson fires? God forbid. But that is what Pince is saying.
One of Pince's readers says:

[...] a premature civil war would be to our advantage. That is why the best sources of anti-terrorist information come from Libya and Saudi Arabia. Muslim strategists know that this isn't the time to pull the trigger. They know that it will be the entry of Turkey into Europe that will definitively seal the outcome of the war. The genocide of Christians will then begin irremediably and gradually (as day follows the night). But I bet that the United States will first let the Muslims weaken Europe, while they reorganize. They will lobby for Turkey's admission, and I think they will get it.

He is making the charge that the U.S. will attempt to weaken Europe, by seeing to it that Turkey enters the EU, thus effectively putting an end to Christianity (in other words, it doesn't matter if the French even do manage to push back the Muslims. By admitting Turkey, the end of Europe is guaranteed anyway.) This is an enormous charge, entailing a great deal of speculation, but it is a common thread at French websites, namely, that the U.S. wants to destroy Europe by pushing for the admission of Turkey.
If French opinion is going to change under pressure from extreme violence committed by Muslims, this change has to be one that is durable. The French also have to realize that the United States of today, despite some signs of life from the Republican Party, is not the United States of Eisenhower or even JFK, but a new monster, multi-culturalized, feminized, socialized and dramatically weakened morally, and that its current president, like the current president of France, is not working in the best interests of traditional America, but only in the interests of this newly created monster. Therefore the patriots of France and the patriots of the U.S. have a common battle, but how these patriots (from all countries of the Western World) will ever coalesce into an understanding, and eventually into an effective opposition to the main-stream governments, is beyond me. It seems we are hopelessly embroiled in useless mutual hatreds, suspicions, accusations and misunderstandings.
Here's another comment to Pince’s observations:

I began to despair of ever finding that the French people have have reached an awareness of the dangers that threaten their very existence, despite the numerous cries of warning from Monsieur Pince and other prophets. What a shameful thing to see these masses go wild over Secret Story, vote for the UMPS, swoon over Diam's, when each day the news informs us of the advancing barbarity on our own soil.
Perhaps you have found the key to this awareness, Monsieur Pince, in this fear that touches a person in his own vital space and leads him to the most terrible reality. As Maurice Dantec said, the conquering Mohammedans will not show any special kindness to the left-wing bobos who have been kissing their feet for years. The sooner the riots you speak of come, the less we will have to educate the masses.

Secret Story is a TV series; Diam's is a female rap singer who often sings disparagingly of France. Maurice Dantec is a Canadian Catholic writer.
I have to keep reminding myself, and others, that speculation is speculation. We don't know what will actually happen. If the French, as a people, feel themselves to be doomed, then they are doomed. If they feel they can bring about a change, then they have to bring about this change.


See also:
Immigration in France: Calculating the Real Figures, 10 August 2009


Being myself a French nationalist, I am well placed to tell you about the mindset of my hapless countrymen, which is as remote from the Frankish mindset as you could possibly imagine; forgotten the struggles of yore, the sacrifices of past generations, Charles Martel's victory at Poitiers, pride in the national flag... Instead you will find a people deeply entrenched in socialism, from cradle to grave, dazed by endless propaganda, which trumpets for Human Rights (wrongly ascribed to French minds, wilfully ignoring of British and U.S. achievements) while outlawing freedom of speech by scurvy legislation (Gayssot laws). A people that firmly believes in universalism and accepting of everyone but themselves, shameful offspring of perpetrators of unutterable atrocities all over the world. In short self-hatred, as Franz Kafka would have identified the phenomenon. We are forbidden to display flags too conspicuously, to drone on our national anthem (which is in effect besmirched and catcalled whenever 'our' teams play). Debate on immigration are little more than a taboo but for a handful of patriots. Assimilation is seen as a dictatorial policy acknowledging white supremacy. Self-reliance has disappeared since long, and solidarity amid our own kin is dwindling owing to the widespread belief that the state, not individuals, must care for the poor. The bonds traditionally uniting citizens have faded away. Even the CIA cannot appraise the actual number of Muslim invaders in France. For us French it is obvious that there are millions of them, just suffice to hang around and have a look in the streets, Paris is but an African colony already. Our language is maimed and put to intolerable distortion by the legions of ''youths'', whose main occupation is burning cars, that is when they are not looting or selling drugs. I reckon numerous amounts of French citizens realise what is happening, but they simply will not act, because of their conflicting allegiances or out of sheer reluctance or fear, and rightly so since reprisals are so frequent when one is an avowed member of the Front National or other so-called right-wing movements. The nationalists or the exponents of national identity are almost universally despised but we all know the day they will be vindicated draws closer by the minute, and we also know we cannot act lest we be entangled into a maze of nonsensical laws and media propaganda, so the obvious choice is to let matters as they are and wait until our ideas gain enough momentum to be hefty. One fact overlooked by the otherwise excellent present article is that for article 16 to apply, it would take a parlementarian majority, for the recipient of sweeping powers would be submitted to a joint control of Parliament and our Constitutional Council, support could thus be withdrawn. Lapsing into a dictatorship would not, therefore, be feasible, nor is that desirable. For this majority to emerge drastic awareness of the situation will be required as well as electoral successes. Let it be clear; I do not imagine this will happen, my bet is that, by then, it will be too late to reverse the trend. Some countries, like Italy, have been exposed to significantly lower levels of immigration until recently, and yet they prove much more reactive. Such countries claim far better prospects, so does Britain, if one considers the rapid ascent of UKIP and the BNP, both anti-immigration parties, committed to overthrowing the criminal and undemocratic EU. Furthermore, worsening economic conditions in Britain make it more likely that she will wake up from her slumber more rapidly. If awareness comes too late, if nationalists of all Western countries fail to unite, then an armed conflict might be inevitable that will dramatically alter the West as we know it today, and that all countries face that issue, including the United States.  

Another surrender 2

Thanks, Blueglasnost. What I gather from your reply is that France, as France, is lost. We can be confident that virtue will still live in individuals and families, maybe even regions, but we do not yet know what political form it will take.

The epic poet Frederick Turner wrote The New World about America in the 24th century, a hodge-podge of warring counties, savage cities ("Riots"), and the 'burbs that the cities prey upon. Perhaps armed and self-defending counties will emerge in France. The few Frenchmen who retain pride and a belief in their right to defend themselves and their territory will have to lead, organize, and set an example for the others.

I spent some time in France as a student in 1977. At that time, even in my foolish youth, I observed the hapless black African street sweepers and street vendors and the vicious North African youths and thought the French were insane for admitting so many Third Worlders into their great and beautiful country.

Not so much a conspiracy...just one more..

@peter vanheyden

Not so much a conspiracy..just one more,non-democratic,totalitarian,fascistic cult.Lets try rewritting that which you wrote and replace Muslims with Nazism,Communism,or Maoism.

"The immigration of Muslims to Europe is following economic rules and has nothing what so ever with a planned strategy."

Nobody is claiming otherwise.Its not the point.Of course they came here for economic reasons and not with a concious strategy for conquest.History must be littered with examples of "economic " migratory population waves that overwhelmed other cultures by shear force of numbers,coupled with the ideological and moral collapse of the indigenous population they replaced. replacing replacing.




Not so much a conspiracy.......

@peter vanderheyden

Not so much a conspiracy...more a way of life. A way of life for the last fourteen hundred years to be precise.Its in the text.The Koran.In other words its in the D.N.A.of Islam.It cannot be anything other than that which it is.The very nature of the beast is such,that if today,every extremist ,fundamentalist radical were rounded up and locked away---within a few years it would spawn another generation of fanatics.Expansionism,Arab,Muslim supreamacist ideology has been blunted for hundreds of years because of technological and military weakness in comparison to the west.

There is no moderate Mein-Koran-Kampf,only activated and de-activated.At present it is activated where ever its techtonic plates rub shoulders with non-Muslims,as in Nigeria,Sudan,Egypt,Lebanon,Israel,Iraq,Pakistan,India,Thailand,Phillipines and several European countries.




freedom of speech

This article starts from the conspiracy theory that there are people out there in the Muslim world that are actively working on the islamisation of Europe.  Like all conspiracy theories, this one is also absolutely ridiculous. The immigration of Muslims to Europe is following economic rules, and has nothing to do what so ever with a planned strategy. That some “enlightened” leaders in the Muslim world see it as a possible way to conquer is a fact. But believe me, they are way too stupid to really organise the all thing.


This being said, the immigration is real, and the growing numbers and influence are real also. But there are other ways to deal with this than spreading conspiracy theories in the hope of a violent outbreak and a total civil war resulting in an ethnic cleansing. As a matter of fact, it are “opinions” like this that make some people doubt about the rightfulness of absolute “freedom of speech” as they are clearly intended to inflict considerable harm to certain people. Unfortunately, in Belgium we have learned that restricting this freedom of speech for what is called “hate speech” results in ridiculous practises like condemning people who “offend” Islam by revealing painful truths about the religion and his creator. Better thus, not to touch freedom of speech at all, and to relentlessly unmask and fight people like Tiberge with words.  



Peter are u serious?

Journeyman is right on the target in answering you , but are you really serious in describing concerns many in Europe have with the growing and poorly integrated Muslim population as a conspiracy theory? Do you see Islam , which Muslims will not give up , being just another religion in the Western Liberal Democracy when Muslim numbers will reach 20, 30, 40% of the populace same way as Christians are today (live and let live)? And I am not talking here about some terrorists or some Islamists , I am talking about normal everyday Islam, so called moderate one (what a lie that is) . In order for Europe to coexist whith Islam when substantial numbers will follow it , the West would have to give up on the whole set of the achievements of the Western Civilization: freedom of consciousness and expression, equality of genders, sexes , religions and non-religions , secularism that allows all religions to coexist in the first place , and more. There is no coexistence with Islam when it feels its strength - we have 56 Muslim contries to demonstrate that ..There is only submission to it, and Muslims consciously or subconsciously will be installing it all over the Europe.

Another surrender?

The Gallo-Romans "made room" for the Burgundians, Visigoths, and Franks with scarcely any resistance, surrendering their property and political power and becoming second-class citizens in their own country. Is that happening again with the African migration to France?

Excellent analysis


I believe as a writer (Tiberge) of this piece, that the only way Islamisation of Europe  will be stopped when Muslims will "overplay" their hand.. Unfortunately, again as the article correctly points out,  one can not count on Western politicians to ever change and  one can not count on the Western Europeans finding their balls (which they have missed in all this  liberalism and in "its not my business" attitude ) suddenly  in mass, but DEFINITELY one can count on the permanent hatred Muslims carry in their hearts for us , for the Western World to spill over when their numbers will reach some critical point. It will finally get us all, and  even the most idiotic idiots among us will have no choice but to barf this Islam out together with Muslims out of  EUROPE. That is the only thing we can count on –the  Muslim hate and stupidity. The free people will always win ...eventually and with price. Oh well, I guess we still did not get it, even after Hitlers and  Commies .