The Dead Hand

Multiculturalism is dead. It was always dead, in the sense that an untruth has no life, but the energies of a vigorous fraud are enough to deceive many for much time. The idea that differing value-systems could coexist within a superstructure, itself imposing equality upon them, was a tempting one: it affirmed a reassuring view of humanity, and more important, it relieved a West that did not believe in itself of the burden of self-assertion. Its lie was always obvious to those willing to think critically about it — what if the notionally subsidiary value-system struck against the value-system undergirding the arbitrating superstructure? — but now it is obvious to nearly all who have lived through the last five years of war and massacre, and seen its latest phase ignited by mere cartoons.


Multiculturalism is dead, but its corpse, like those of the incorruptible saints, still smells sweet. This is partly because it does have its harmless aspects: as an aesthetic preference, it may be silly, but in itself is no threat. Mostly it is because the alternative is unfathomable to its proponents. Men so invested in the abandonment of any value-system but the equalization of all value-systems are ill-equipped to choose among them — and still less to defend that choice.

Consider the case of one Martin Burcharth: a Dane and a journalist, he is the very archetype of the class under threat in the cartoon affair. He could be forthright and truthful — but he chooses not to be, and he does so in the very pages of the New York Times. Today we see him acting as dhimmi, peddling the same myths that outraged Muslims put forth to excuse the savagery and violence of their own community. Burcharth asserts a Danish “intolerance” for Islam (citing, among other things, the absence of a Muslim cemetery in the country), which, in the absence of actual mistreatment or denial of rights, implicitly justifies Muslim rage. Burcharth posits that the Jyllands-Posten published the Muhammed cartoons “in the context of a climate of pervasive hostility toward anything Muslim in Denmark.” The truth is that the newspaper solicited the cartoons only after finding that Muslim “pervasive hostility” was cowing artists into respecting their communal taboos under threat of violence — or death.


Most outrageously, Burcharth excuses the actions of Danish Muslim leaders by noting that they “ran out of options” in their quest to force the Jyllands-Posten — and by extension, the Danish state — to act as proper dhimmis. In a sane world — in the democratic West in which we ostensibly live — one does not expect that one is justified in pulling out all the stops in the quest to secure acquiescence to one’s sensibilities from every institution of public life. I may dislike the New York Times’ publication of Martin Burcharth, but basic civic maturity dictates that once I hold my protest marches and write my irate letters to the editor, it ends there: I certainly do not seek to bring state authority to bear against the free press — nor do I invoke the wrath of foreign powers against my country.

The Muslim leaders of Denmark did all these things. They sought to make the Danish state crack down on its own free press. They sought to have foreign ambassadors chastise the Danish state. And then, fatally, they went to the Arab League and the Organization of the Islamic Conference — armed, it must be noted, with genuinely awful fake cartoons of their own — whence they finally got the bloody firestorm they wanted. An earlier age would have called these acts dishonest and traitorous to the very nation in which they hold citizenship: “But, really,” asks Burcharth, “what choice did they have?”

Well. They had the choice to be patriots, to be civilized, and to be sane. But why suffer the onerous burdens of self-restraint when the victim classes are rife with those willing to make excuses for you — and even to apologize to you? That is one lesson of this wretched episode: if multiculturalism is dead, then what will replace it, at least in Europe, will not be the culture that first conceived it. It will be the culture and community with the most vigor, the most confidence — and the greater willingness to kill. That community is obvious to all outside the likes of Martin Burcharth.

The other lesson of the “cartoon war” derives directly from the actions of the Danish imams — but we already saw it in the hate of the Finsbury Park Mosque, the violence of the Arab European League, and the flames of the French banlieues. Paul Belien said it best: “[W]hen a country has let in a Muslim minority it has let in the Muslim majority from the rest of the globe.” One only hopes that this lesson, driven home in Denmark, takes root elsewhere in Europe. Though made fresh by events, it is a lesson that long predates this affair:

[T]hat most precious possession of Western Man, freedom of thought and expression, is threatened by the spread of creeds which, claiming the privilege of tolerance when in the position of a minority, seek only to establish a position of power in which they can suppress and obliterate all views but their own.

The founders of the Mont Pelerin Society had Communism in mind when they drafted this a generation ago. It rings as true now that Islamism subverts the very societies in which it has found refuge. Will the threatened hosts learn? Will they act? There is no confidence in their self-defense; there is no sureness in their rectitude. Only one thing is sure: this is not over yet.

Re: Democracy and Violence

Nice to know your real name is Faheem Hussain! I would never have believed that you ate breakfast? This is good to know, you might actually be human instead of a computer spewing muslim data. So what you are saying is, that it is alright to have violence as long as it is the interest of muslims? And there is no such thing as democracy unless it is a muslim version. Because all other forms are specious and oppressive. But violence performed in behest of the muslim religion and Islam is alright?

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Re" Palestinian Migrants!

Hmmm! Did not the Palestinian migrant workers bring up those points for charges, because the other natins replaced them working for Israelis? Could it be that the Israelis became
tired of having Shahada, mixing with the workers from the gaza, instead of importing clean labor who would not commit acts of terrorism acts?!? Just a point!

Odin Be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Well, I guess you have to

Well, I guess you have to finally decide Imran or Jemima! Wow this could be tough!

Another thing.. you cannot be a bitch, a slut and a hooker! You have to decide Peace! Get it together, slut!

By the way you are still misspelling the word hooker. Are you dumb by nature or just ignorant by birth..either way.. you are still only worth 50 pfennig from what I heard! * wink, smile and waves*

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!


and does what u say apply to christianity and its dark ages and till now as in coptic orthodx church.

Really, Peace You ignorant

Really, Peace You ignorant slut! you have to learn english! No one can figure out what the hell you are talking about any more!

Odin Be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Poor brainwashed emeda30

Fact is that New Believer knows both the Islamic and the Western world and she had the opportunity to choose the best of the two.
The thing is that you don’t have any choice and are stuck in this prehistoric oppressive regime.
I hope you’ll do all right and can agree with your not voluntarily faith although statistically your prospects doesn’t look too bright.

All the best

to gorm

do u comparer islam with what u call western civilization mr idiot..islam is a divine religion u compare with christianity and judaism only...
so u only want us to be like you worshippers of odin or athesit...anything but not islam are brain washed and blind

To Gorm re: peace

who'll give me twenty dollars, twenty dollars for the idiot, peace, trying to speak english now. do I hear thirty dollars in the back now, thirty going once, thirty five now in front. Forty, forty five on the phone. forty eight in the back.. fifty ! Do I hear fifty? no takers...sold american for forty eight! all proceeds to the Danish government with our apologies we could not get more!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Imran Khan is Free You have

Imran Khan is Free You have a chance Peace!

Do not worry Peace.. Imran Khan is free now.. maybe he will marry You * wink*

hahahahahaha Stick and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt you slut..especially if they are not true!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Iran upset about more cartoons Pt. II

Here are two links: one to the new cartoon that has Ahmadinejad upset and the other to the article about the furor.  Frankly, let's kill them with humor!

The description of Ahmadinejad's reaction is here:

Iran upset about more cartoons

Iran's Ahmadinejad is upset about another cartoon.  An Italian Minister has ordered t-shirts with a Mohammed cartoon on them:

"I have had T-shirts made with the cartoons that have upset Islam and I will start wearing them today," Ansa quoted Calderoli as saying.

He said the T-shirts were not meant to be a provocation but added that he saw no point trying to appease extremists.

"We have to put an end to this story that we can talk to these people. They only want to humiliate people. Full stop. And what are we becoming? The civilization of melted butter?" Calderoli said...."

Where does it end?  First it was the Danish cartoons.  Now it's another cartoon showing the Iranian soccer team at the Olympic stadium dressed in bomb belts, according to an article at Expatica.  The Italian Minister Calderoni is to be congratulated and emulated.  I'm going to get a MoBomb t-shirt and I suggest everyone wear one IN SOLIDARITY WITH DENMARK!


To Paul Belien, Mange Take! Thank You! Merci

Mange Take! Thank You! Merci Beaucoup! Tackar Dig!

My dear Paul Belien!

My manners are atrocious Sir. I have been a member 1 week and 5 days! Please accept both my apologies for not telling you how great your website and the Brussels Journal is before now! As well as my congratulations on the upstanding job that you are doing bringing light and information into a dismal age!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Iran upset about more cartoons

According to a poster at lgf today:

Ahmadinejad is upset over ANOTHER cartoon, this one of the Iranian Olympic soccer team dressed in bomb belts. 

It seems Ajhadinejad doesn't like jokes directed at him and his objects of pride so I say....let's have a world-wide contest of jokes about 'The Little Hitler' in Iran and keep 'em coming.  Jokes are cheaper than bullets and just as wounding, especially if you're 'Rumpelstiltskin' Ahmadinejad.


I feel rather sorry for you, emeda30. You have yet to learn the difference between propaganda, and truth. That you are relying on propaganda in your adherence to Islam is obvious. Mohamet was a bloodthirsty warlord who lusted after women, power, wealth. His religion was but a tool that helped him accomplish all this. Mahomet rose to power among a nation of extremely ignorant people, who were enslaved to the grossest idolatry. That is why his religion gained credibility - simply because it was better than what they had previously. But Mahomet's religion would have got nowhere in the west because it was so patently absurd. It is a mismash of the old testament, arabic tradition, and heretical teaching about Christ.

Dissatisfaction with the hypocrisy of established religion is no reason to forsake Christianity. Right from the start, Christians have had to fight against gnostic heretics who place greater value on knowledge than obedience, and today the church is overwhelmed by them. But the truth is still found in Christ alone, and in forsaking him, you are abandoning your own soul.

Another Islamic Conversion Ended!

Ohhhh! Then divesting themselves of teh miserable husbands they have taken that were muslims afterwards. Hmm! seems Jemima Goldsmith dumped that husband she had as well! Well sometimes it takes you 3 month, sometimes 7 years..sometimes 9 years as the ex mrs Khan did! Good for her! Do not worry there is a website up! All is revealed!
Another one bites the dust.. another one gone and another one gone..another bites the dust

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

to the rotten

go and correct your information rotten hooker..jemmia didnot leave islam adn her fathe ris dead and she talks nicely about her exhusbnad

Jemima Goldsmith divorce announced 22 June 2004!

She and Hugh Grant, the former actor were seen sunning themselves in Barbados happily in 05 May 2005.

Jemima left her husband! Jemima left her husband!

In 1995, he (Imran Khan) married Jemima (aka Haiqa) Khan who is the daughter of the late British billionaire Sir James Goldsmith. Jemima Khan embraced Islam before she married Khan. They announced their divorce on 22 June 2004. They still visit each other with the children.

To Peace.... Jemima left her husband! Jemima left her husband! Little ignorant slut! I told you I am not a hooker.. but if you hurry I hear the guys on the corner of the Banhoferplatz are looking for one. Hurry up! You should be able to make at least 50 pfennig. * Smile* There were holing up a sign that said..looking for ..a peace!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!

Too Shake.

Q. "Which one is it for You? One God and the human Prophet or two Gods?"

A. In short, no Gawds whatsoever. Just two human imposters. Your turn to pick the more bloody one.


who is creating blasphemy according to what laws?

Emperor Leon 3 established the law that no icon can be drawn, the reason was, that paintings can be seen as gods themselves. Carolus Magnus (Charlemagne) found that no false gods are wanted, but destroying paintings is also a cultural ignorancy. In between Islam made a law that no-one can put a living creature into a picture. Less of all the Prophet.
By the way, Christians also didn't paint their God Son-Father pictures earlier than XII century. As lately as XIV century, painting Mohammed was allowed, later only with a crepe on his face.
Here's where I'm confused. If picturing a Prophet is not allowed because it can lead to false Gods. Why are cartoons not allowed as they surely are not a basis for any icons?

Let's go on from here - when you rage about your Prophet put into a picture, isn't this a mark, that you are already feeling about your Prophet like an icon of a godly being. Isn't this a mark that for you there is no ONE God, but Mohammed is a God also? In this case, isn't it you, radical muslims, who are creating blasphemy, not unfortunate Danish?
Holy Quran says clearly: There is only one God.
Which one is it for You? One God and the human Prophet or two Gods?

Simple comment

I am not versed in the Koran (Quran?), but is it traditional or at the least acceptable for Muslims to encourage or encite violence due to a comic strip? This religion does not appear like a loving one or one of peace.


Re: Simple comment

That is it in a nutshell superior auto.. they are not areligion of peace! Never forget that!

Odin be Praised! Baldur Save Us!