Living in the Extended Present
From the desk of George Handlery on Sat, 2009-02-14 09:34

George Handlery about the week that was. Historic and contemporary immigration. Crime and psychiatry. About what was and what can be. True or false: A wall is a wall? The present’s new past. The extended present and its pitfalls. The misuse of missile defense.
1. Supposedly, densely inhabited countries can prop up their dropping population by immigration. Indeed, a demographically oriented migration policy can make sense. This is why it has been applied by the classical countries of immigration. In their case, though, the purpose of immigration has not been to replace natural growth but to accelerate it. The goal was to populate empty spaces. However, these receiving countries have adjusted their policy of acceptance. Measures were introduced to filter immigrants by considering their skills and their willingness to adapt in the pursuit of success. At present, not infrequently, immigrants, who often demand entry as refugees, are unskilled. This coincides with the growing structural unemployment of unqualified indigenous workers. All too frequently, not only skills but also the aspiration to accept the values that cause social mobility is also missing. That is why, given the absolute numbers involved, the rags-to-riches stories are becoming rare among some immigrant groups. Most of their members are satisfied by the returns from bad jobs that mean dead end careers in shrinking industries ending in welfare dependency. Aggravating is the implications for the social order, public security and to the principles of the host’s political system.



